Posted on 01/07/2017 2:57:35 AM PST by Helicondelta
Here’s the reference that was sourced in the FR post:
https://sputniknews.com/us/201701071049343650-us-intelligence-report-obama-election
It is credible because it links to the Annex A of the intelligence report itself which is here in its entirety:
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf
It's right out of the spooks playbook. Divert, evade and deceive.
This may be a criminal leak of Specat info.
And it may be a complete fabrication by NBC, or the supposed leaker.
Thanks..it needs wide distribution. Hope someone with trump sees it. No one seems to be saying anything about it
Yes it is illegal.
But it’s not enforceable against the press. There have been several attempts.
Why doth treason never prosper?
Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason.
I don’t want to shut them down i want to break them up.
It reminds me of the Jay Rockefeller "pull the trigger" email from 2003, where Democrats conspired to push Republicans into sham investigations to serve Democrat purposes to delegitimize President Bush.
From 2003, Transcript of a memo to the Democrat members of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, found on a shared server by Republican aide Manual Miranda:
We have carefully reviewed our options under the rules and believe we have identified the best approach. Our plan is as follows:1) Pull the majority along as far as we can on issues that may lead to major new disclosures regarding improper or questionable conduct by administration officials. We are having some success in that regard. For example, in addition to the president's State of the Union speech, the chairman has agreed to look at the activities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense as well as Secretary Bolton's office at the State Department. The fact that the chairman supports our investigations into these offices and co-signs our requests for information is helpful and potentially crucial. We don't know what we will find but our prospects for getting the access we seek is far greater when we have the backing of the majority. (Note: we can verbally mention some of the intriguing leads we are pursuing.)
2) Assiduously prepare Democratic "additional views" to attach to any interim or final reports the committee may release. Committee rules provide this opportunity and we intend to take full advantage of it. In that regard, we have already compiled all the public statements on Iraq made by senior administration officials. We will identify the most exaggerated claims and contrast them with the intelligence estimates that have since been declassified. Our additional views will also, among other things, castigate the majority for seeking to limit the scope of the inquiry. The Democrats will then be in a strong position to reopen the question of establishing an independent commission (i.e. the Corzine amendment).
3) Prepare to launch an independent investigation when it becomes clear we have exhausted the opportunity to usefully collaborate with the majority. We can pull the trigger on an independent investigation at any time-- but we can only do so once. The best time to do so will probably be next year either:
A) After we have already released our additional views on an interim report -- thereby providing as many as three opportunities to make our case to the public: 1) additional views on the interim report; 2) announcement of our independent investigation; and 3) additional views on the final investigation; orB) Once we identify solid leads the majority does not want to pursue. We could attract more coverage and have greater credibility in that context than one in which we simply launch an independent investigation based on principled but vague notions regarding the "use" of intelligence.
In the meantime, even without a specifically authorized independent investigation, we continue to act independently when we encounter foot-dragging on the part of the majority. For example, the FBI Niger investigation was done solely at the request of the vice chairman; we have independently submitted written questions to DoD; and we are preparing further independent requests for information.
Summary
Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq. Yet, we have an important role to play in the revealing the misleading -- if not flagrantly dishonest methods and motives -- of the senior administration officials who made the case for a unilateral, preemptive war. The approach outline above seems to offer the best prospect for exposing the administration's dubious motives and methods.
Once this memo was discovered, the MSM circled the wagons around Jay Rockefeller, who was being accused of manipulating the Intelligence Committee for partisan purposes.
Orrin Hatch, who fell back on his habit of capitulating under pressure when given a strong hand, supported the firing of Miranda after Democrats claimed that Miranda had "hacked" into the computer to find the memo. The truth is that it was an open server, available to all committee members, and the Democrat memo was in plain sight.
Republicans let Democrats successfully change the story from the content of the memo to how the memo was discovered.
-PJ
The best wars are the ones that are waged with entire honesty.
And unfortunately, Republicans show no spine for fighting back even when Democrats are on a pure witchhunt and making up utter lies.
I am hoping that Trump shows the rest of the weak-willed Republicans how to fight and stand up to their dirty tricks.
Seriously! Do they not see the hypocrisy?
>>Suspend their broadcast license.<<
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Wrong issue. NBC is as free as Assange to publish once they are given the material.
The illegality is the person who delivered it to them.
Thank you for making that important distinction.
I am convinced, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that McCrisis had been promised either SoS or SecDef under Cankles.
Well said and argued.
I don’t think there was anything to leak. NBC simply made it up.
said the same.
hey hack us, we hack them , but the turds in this country act as if this is a new thing.
Not my fault of anyone , but the Dems who were hacked. They never took their data seriously, and now they they reap what they sow.
We saw what the Dem party thinks about Americans. We saw how they rigged the election against Bernie. We saw how they work with the media.
Their game is up , and have been exposed.
Yes, I was thinking along the same lines. But the interference is with the election results, specifically trying to delegitimize Trump's win.
These press eggheads have had way too much free reign to undermine the country. Boil them.
Hmmmmm ..?? Is it possible this is why Megyn was hired on at NBC ..????? .. Very curious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.