[entropy12]

Another pro-business (=more middle class jobs) appointee by POTUS Trump. Go Ajit Pai!

[LostInBayport]

The slant in this piece is amazing. First they presume they are “consumer protection” regulations, which is a nice way of saying free $#!^ for people who don’t pay for it.

Second, they lie and say that the FCC is stopping companies from providing services at discounted rates. The FCC is saying no such thing; they are simply saying the government will not subsidize said discounted rates.

The New York Times is slime, stinky sticky slime. They are the enemy of a free people. I pray I live long enough to see that paper fold and its title consigned to the ash heap of history.

[60Gunner]

“With these strong-arm tactics, Chairman Pai is showing his true stripes,” said Matt Wood, the policy director at the consumer group Free Press."

Hell yeah. And I like those stripes.

[VitacoreVision]

Good. I’m anti-Net Neutrality.

[Nomad577]

Changing net neutrality makes me nervous.

[Tzimisce]

The Supreme Court already said the government doesn’t have the power to implement Net Neutrality.

Obama did it anyway.

[Boogieman]

Net neutrality = socialized internet.

[Myrddin]

Net neutrality is redistribution of wealth by government edict. The internet is a conglomeration of privately purchased servers, routers and network paths. Each end user pays an ISP for "last mile" access. The ISP uses the proceeds to pay for buildings, power, cooling, routers, network connections to other networks and management staff. A large number of tiny businesses working in their own little space. Bandwidth is very much sensitive to how much has been invested in each small business. End to end performance steps through tens of these small enterprises. The federal government has no business forcing these small businesses to impose a tax on their users and extend subsidized service that is reimbursed by the government via the collected tax revenues. The equipment was not purchased by the government and they have no legal right to seize control of operation and use of the private property.

There is certainly a socialist faction in the internet user community that believes the net is a "public utility" somehow owned and controlled by some larger organization. They believe they have a "right" to unlimited use of this "public utility". They are dead wrong. The only part of the network that the FCC has any legal hooks in regulating to the telephone and cable companies. They provide the raw network paths between points to that large body of private businesses that run ISP businesses and server farms. The phome companies have to make a capital investment for their network equipment and generally are guaranteed a small, fixed rate of return over an allowed equipment service life. Rates are adjusted periodically to ensure a net profit for the "common carrier". They are content agnostic. It's bandwidth between two points with an agreed level of reliability of service. The telco business isn't very glamorous. I spent 12 years there as a network and IT engineer before moving on to more interesting work as a DoD contractor.

[onona]

Behind all the smoke and mirrors of the first week, this was one of the all time best moves by Trump.