Fake news.
“Apparent” “Apparently”
Hmmmmm.
Oh puleeeze the guy simply knows his office submitted anything they had to, and he said all we’ve done is submit briefs not undermine the case. Hardly the stuff of perjury.
You are a regular fake news outlet.
What the Hell would we do without you.
IF his office deliberately didn’t file a needed brief to undermine the case, that might be the opposite of his statement, but merely being mistaken that any briefs were filed is just that a mistaken choice of words. In effect, he was saying he didn’t undermine the case and his office cooperated and submitted whatever was necessary.
“appears to have made a false statement under oath to the Senate.”
This isn’t fake news, from these clowns, it’s news about something that didn’t happen.
This is about news that never happened and will not happen. It exists only in the rabid anti Trump mind of the so called reporter/journalist/mediot. So, it doesn’t even qualify as fake news!
.
I have a new tagline when I reply to a post about news that never happened nor will happen. It doesn’t even qualify as fake news!
Yep, the fake news industry just keeps on rolling.
All I can say is, the media is killing themselves and the RAT party, which I love to see...are there going to be any RATS left after 2018??? I hope not!!!
Even if it is FAKE NEWS, just call him Hillary. She got away with everything so far in the lying category.
Liberal: “Sir, what time is it?”
Republican: (looks at watch) “930AM, sir”
Liberal: “LIAR! The clock on the wall says 929AM! This is an outrage! Your sworn testimony will be forwarded to the prosecutor!”
Wow, are they ever pulling at straws. It is just more despicable, desperate Democrat drivel.
Edmondson was had opened a can of worms that a smart Arkansas AG could have closed. He/she should have gotten samples taken of the Arkansas River where it flows into OK from KS, then above and below the city of Tulsa (especially after a big spring rain event), then again at the OK/AR border, then countersued OK for polluting the ARKANSAS river.
I can't understand why anyone would bother reading them.
The nominee is usually afforded the courtesy of correcting a mistake during testimony. This is not a huge deal.
He also left the toilet seat up in the bathroom off of the “hearing” room.
The exchange between DailyKosJunior and his attorney, in whole:
"Mr. Pruitt was referencing a notice filed in which the Attorney General's office sent a Supreme Court decision to the judge which supports Oklahoma's arguments made in the case.At this point, I believe the EPA nominee has a pretty good defamation case."On 7-6-2011 the Attorney General's office filed notice of relevant authority sending the court the Supreme Court decision in AEP v Connecticut which the Attorney General's office says supports their arguments made in the poultry case regarding whether the CWA displaced its federal common law nuisance case."
Business Insider asked Konkus in a follow-up email where in the notice Pruitt's office encouraged the judge to reach a decision.
Konkus replied: "His intent in sending the notice was to encourage a decision in favor of Oklahoma's position."
A false statement or a misstatement? Was it voluntarily corrected?
But it’s OK to lie to Congress, just ask HilLIARy