Posted on 02/26/2017 8:16:44 AM PST by HarleyLady27
The only people who are angered by the decision to make Tom Perez the next DNC chair are the Democrats. Republicans are actually very happy that he was selected for the position although they would have been just as happy with Keith Ellison because both candidates ensure the Republicans are going to gain even more ground over the next few years as both are terrible candidates.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Ping...
Do everything you can to convince them that the same rigged system that screwed Bernie has now screwed Muzzie Keith. That’s what they want to believe anyway...
I don’t know what they are upset about.
Perez is a far more competent SJW and Marxist lawyer.
Ellison is just a garden variety Muslim.
ping
I do not why I keep repeating this....The Democrats are doing a magnificent job destroying themselves politically!!! Luv it!!!
Ellison predicted that Trump would lead the Republican party back in 2015. He has great political instincts. I’m glad he lost.
Perez is just a Hillary boot licker like Podesta.
They don’t care because they no longer need the people’s money. They get plenty of $ from selling access and socialist insurgents like Soros.
Bernie fans take another one for the team.
Bernie fans, keep your heads up. If it wasn't for you, the democrat establishment wouldn't have won anything in the past year. At least against you they are 2-0.
Are the Russians responsible for this?
We have felt their pain; there will be days when we might feel it once again.
KEEP WINNING PRESIDENT TRUMP! NOT TIRED YET!
It will also ensure more RINOS appear in the R party, advancing the uniparty agenda.
Putin hacked Ellison’s personal server at his Mosque in Minneapolis. Everyone knows that... /sarc
They should be used to their out of touch elites rigging their elections by now. It been going on since Boss Tweed ran the DNC.
Patriots need to support Pres. Trump to work with the states to amend the Constitution to prohibit political party support of federal elected officials imo.
After all, given the feds constitutionally limited powers where domestic policy is concerned, how many political parties does it take to run the US Mail Service (1.8.7)?
I say none.
Consider that the smart crooks long ago figured out that getting themselves elected as federal lawmakers to steal peoples money with unconstitutional federal taxes beats robbing banks for a living.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
Drain the swamp! Drain the swamp!
Remember in November 18 !
Since Trump entered the 16 presidential race too late for patriots to make sure that there were state sovereignty-respecting candidates on the primary ballots, patriots need make sure that such candidates are on the 18 primary ballots so that they can be elected to support Trump in draining the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp.
Such a Congress will also be able to finish draining the swamp with respect to getting the remaining state sovereignty-ignoring, activist justices off of the bench.
Noting that the primaries start in Iowa and New Hampshire in February 18, patriots need to challenge candidates for federal office in the following way.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitutions Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal governments powers.
Patriots also need to find candidates that are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal governments limited powers listed below.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphasis added]. Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.