Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford
See my #83 and consider dealing with that reality rather than spending paragraph after paragraph attacking me personally.

Saw it. Dealt with it.

I'm not attacking you personally, I'm simply describing objective reality with respect to your uncontrollable impulse to not only gratuitously bash the President, but also your propensity to fundamentally misjudge his actions and cast them in the most negative, hysterical, hand-wringing light possible.

In reality, some of the "missteps" you've concern-trolled about, such as the President's recent tweet about wiretapping done at the behest of 0bama and his ilk, are nothing short of brilliant political moves, to which you've applied only the shallowest of "analysis"...

86 posted on 03/08/2017 12:28:02 AM PST by sargon ("If we were in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, the Left would protest for zombies' rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: sargon
see my #88.


89 posted on 03/08/2017 12:35:20 AM PST by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: sargon
see my #88.


90 posted on 03/08/2017 12:35:32 AM PST by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: sargon
I'm not attacking you personally,

(Really?)

I'm simply describing objective reality with respect to your uncontrollable impulse to not only gratuitously bash the President, but also your propensity to fundamentally misjudge his actions and cast them in the most negative, hysterical, hand-wringing light possible.

In reality, some of the "missteps" you've concern-trolled about, such as the President's recent tweet about wiretapping done at the behest of 0bama and his ilk, are nothing short of brilliant political moves, to which you've applied only the shallowest of "analysis"...

Those are clearly personal attacks? Not one word about substance just personal attacks against me.


96 posted on 03/08/2017 1:25:45 AM PST by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: sargon
Look at your second paragraph in which you accuse me of the "shallowest of 'analysis'" but without a word of analysis of your own, just your own conclusion. You seldom get near the facts perhaps because I am living rent free in your head.

Every one of the warnings which I raised on Saturday have been vindicated over and over on the establishment left wing networks. The fact is Trump has left himself vulnerable by the erratic nature of his tweets, by its failure to produce any evidence to support his claim. He leaves himself open to the charges of being erratic, he leaves himself open to the charges that he has brought charges without proof, the commentators point out that he has the power to produce such proof but has not done so. He has been refuted on three levels. All problems which I pointed out in my "analysis."

Indeed, the President of the United States has the power and the authority to produce the evidence right now but he has chosen not to. Worse, he has issued a cryptic statement that there would be no more comments until the congressional investigations plod on to a conclusion, God knows when that might be. Inevitably, the president appears to be backtracking.

Whatever support that has been mustered for his claims has been forthcoming largely from a real conservative detested by so many on this forum, Mark Levin, who has done the president's work for him as best it can be done in the absence of responsible action by the president himself.

If you think it is responsible for the president of the United States to tweet charges generating a potential constitutional crisis without offering any proof, then you believe that it is proper for him to do so for political reasons. You applaud politicizing this constitutional crisis. I am not against reaping the political benefits, but there must be a legal and constitutional basis for these kinds of charges or it diminishes the office of the president and ultimately causes a lack of faith in the individual. It confirms every left-wing allegation that the man is unstable. It is not a proper way to proceed in a constitutional crisis and licking our chops over illusory political short-term gains is ultimately self-defeating.

Either Obama has ordered wiretapping of Trump or he has not. If he has, the uproar will be immense. If he has not, the backlash will be very painful for all of us who have hopes for Donald Trump. I have hopes for Donald Trump, not Donald Trump right or wrong, but Donald Trump conservative.


97 posted on 03/08/2017 1:27:29 AM PST by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson