Replies

The Supreme Court struck down all the laws on the books that said that life begins at conception & Roe versus Wade was court-ordered DE-REGULATION of state-licensed medical doctors, putting abortionists alone above the law, with license to kill & protected by “privacy”.
But what about male reproductive rights & right to privacy? How does government know who the father of an unwed mother’s baby is? Why does an unwed mother have standing to sue for child support when she does not possess a marriage license or contract for government to enforce.? Nobody forces a female to get pregnant, to have a baby or keep any baby she has.
And if there is no law on the books saying that life begins at conception, then what possible legal, moral, philosophic basis can there be for “making men pay” for children of unwed mothers? (or taxpayers, for that matter) Sex is neither a criminal nor a civil offense. Why don’t males have equal right to privacy & productive rights. If feminists didn’t hate men so much & demand that men be made to pay for unwed mothers’ babies, perhaps men might be more sympathetic to the “choice” argument. _
Men don’t even get a tax deduction for child support -——& feminists who demanded “no fault” divorce have no problem with government nullifying a marriage contract entered into at a church wedding, but they also have no problem imposing on contract on men to make them pay child support to ex wives and unwed mothers. It’s as if government is the one holding the shotgun to the head of men, instead of the pregnant girl’s father. Is that right?