Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump stirs debate in remarks on American Civil War
BBC ^ | 5/1/17

Posted on 05/01/2017 3:39:29 PM PDT by Timpanagos1

US President Donald Trump has stirred debate by asking why the American Civil War happened, and pondering whether it could have been "worked out".

In a radio interview, he suggested the conflict might have been avoided if President Andrew Jackson had still been in office.

The 1861-65 Civil War between the northern and southern states was principally caused by slavery.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-234 next last
To: DarkSavant

Every northern state had either eliminated slavery or had a defined path to eventual abolition. ZERO southern states had either.


181 posted on 05/02/2017 9:22:08 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
Maryland did not have a path until 1863, long after the war started. Lincoln explicitly stated he had no intention of ending slavery.

The North had no moral high ground.
182 posted on 05/02/2017 9:25:48 AM PDT by DarkSavant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Saying that the south chose war to further their secession is like saying that the school kid chose war by refusing to give the bully his lunch money.

I see. And what threat had the big bully North made that forced the South to respond with war?

183 posted on 05/02/2017 9:28:01 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: DarkSavant

Jeebus - are you really that uneducated?

Lincoln recognized that he didn’t have the power to issue an executive order eliminating slavery - it had to be done through the amendment process in Congress.

What Lincoln told the south was that he would not interfere with their pursuit of The Peculiar Institution in the south. He intended to block the expansion of slaver into the territories however.

There was plenty of dirt to go around but the north had infinitely higher moral ground than the south.


184 posted on 05/02/2017 9:33:50 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
Jeebus - are you really that uneducated?

No, but you are.

Care to explain why federal marshals were still apprehending slaves in Union states even during the war?
185 posted on 05/02/2017 9:44:54 AM PDT by DarkSavant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: DarkSavant

Citation?


186 posted on 05/02/2017 9:47:57 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
https://www.amazon.com/Slave-Catchers-Enforcement-Fugitive-1850-1860-ebook/dp/B00AWB5HV4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1493744141&sr=8-1&keywords=the+slave+catchers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEC60_tVrAQ
187 posted on 05/02/2017 9:57:14 AM PDT by DarkSavant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: DarkSavant

Those speak in generalities. Got anything specific?


188 posted on 05/02/2017 9:59:19 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

Two minutes into the video shows a direct citation from the book, with specific cases.


189 posted on 05/02/2017 10:04:20 AM PDT by DarkSavant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: DarkSavant

OK, I went back and watched a little longer. It sounds like the marshals were doing their job.


190 posted on 05/02/2017 10:14:29 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

“infinitely higher moral ground than the south.”

Most hate-mongering and ignorant statement made my a typical southern hating liberal.


191 posted on 05/02/2017 11:38:28 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement, I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

You claiming the south started the war is what causes the rest of your idiotic conclusions.


192 posted on 05/02/2017 11:40:32 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement, I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Bull Snipe

“You don’t negotiate with an illegal government that no nation on earth recognizes as legitimate.”

You mean like the USA that waged war against the crown? Kind of a dumb statement that you made, huh?


193 posted on 05/02/2017 11:43:04 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement, I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
You claiming the south started the war is what causes the rest of your idiotic conclusions.

You claiming that they didn't explains the fantasy world that most Confederate supporters live in.

194 posted on 05/02/2017 11:44:45 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad; Bull Snipe

Bull Snipe isn’t the dumb one toad. The two events aren’t analogous.


195 posted on 05/02/2017 11:48:03 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

It is not like negotiating with the crown. It is more like a President negotiating with the Isil “state” No nation on this planet recognizes it as a legitimate nation. No country anywhere on the planet earth, recognized the Confederacy as a legitimate nation.


196 posted on 05/02/2017 1:01:26 PM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: rednek

That’s how I’ve come to learn it as well.


197 posted on 05/02/2017 1:06:08 PM PDT by JerseyDvl ("If you're going through hell, keep going.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DarkSavant

Slavery was still legal in 4 states of the Union. The Fugitive Slave Act had not been repealed. Therefore, Federal officials were acting in accordance with the law. There was a Supreme Court Decision that specifically stated the United States Government could not interfere with slavery in any state that legally recognized the practice.
Lincoln was obeying the law.


198 posted on 05/02/2017 1:32:00 PM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
I see. And what threat had the big bully North made that forced the South to respond with war?

The North refused to remove their troops from sovereign confederate soil at Ft. Sumter in S. Carolina, and even attempted to fortify their position there.
199 posted on 05/02/2017 2:16:13 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: rednek
The war was about States Rights...and had nothing to do with slavery until Lincoln threw that in. It is called the “War of Northern Aggression” for a reason in the South

Yes, that is more in line with the truth.
200 posted on 05/02/2017 2:17:47 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-234 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson