That eternal bastion of feminism and political correctness, the Chicago Tribune...
1 posted on
05/07/2017 6:42:45 PM PDT by
cmj328
To: cmj328
Question asked = question answered.
To: cmj328
1891 :)
Some things truly don’t change
3 posted on
05/07/2017 6:46:05 PM PDT by
dp0622
(The only thing an upper crust Conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
To: cmj328
Both sexes are calculating, but in different ways. The difference? Men trade in good and services. Women trade on their feelings, looks, and (drumroll....) sex.
4 posted on
05/07/2017 6:46:20 PM PDT by
rbg81
(Truth is stranger than fiction)
To: cmj328
The author doesn’t get out much, huh?
6 posted on
05/07/2017 6:48:49 PM PDT by
Jim Noble
(Die Gedanken sind Frei)
To: cmj328
This was already posted...back on May 23, 1891.
Doesn't anybody do a search anymore? Jeez.
To: cmj328
Better to discuss what they have become (and the gents too).
10 posted on
05/07/2017 6:55:12 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: cmj328
Interesting article. Thanks for posting.
From a famous author who wrote stories about the late 1800s:
“A true gentleman is at a disadvantage in dealing with women. Women are realists, and their tactics are realistic, so no man should be a gentleman where women are concerned unless the women are very, very old or very, very young. Women admire gentlemen, and sleep with cads.”
Louis L’Amour
11 posted on
05/07/2017 6:57:15 PM PDT by
RepRivFarm
("During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." -George Orwell)
To: cmj328
Sure are, as are men.
Difference is women look to men for money, whereas men look to money for women.
On average, a wealthy man is as exciting to a woman as a beautiful woman is to a man.
Makes sense biologically, in that women have had to worry about resources for their children.
To: cmj328
Yes. That is why I married a band director who later became a missionary. For the money.
14 posted on
05/07/2017 7:29:32 PM PDT by
Jemian
(War Eagle!)
To: cmj328
Women are not mercenary, they are hypergamous. But I dont think that word existed in 1891.
15 posted on
05/07/2017 7:32:24 PM PDT by
suijuris
To: cmj328
19 posted on
05/07/2017 8:01:42 PM PDT by
t4texas
(Remember the Alamo)
To: cmj328; All
Yes. Often deliberately, always subconsciously.
Hypergamy. It is what they do. Every single one.
21 posted on
05/07/2017 8:02:50 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: cmj328
To: cmj328
The stronger sex is really the weaker sex because of the weakness of the stronger sex for the weaker sex. ;o)
28 posted on
05/07/2017 9:27:24 PM PDT by
boatbums
(Authority has a way of descending to certitude, and certitude begets hubris.)
To: cmj328
Republican Mind = Male
Democrat Mind = Female
Who wins the emotional arguments with voters.
31 posted on
05/07/2017 10:37:27 PM PDT by
Hoosier-Daddy
("Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious")
To: cmj328
33 posted on
05/08/2017 3:20:51 AM PDT by
SunTzuWu
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson