Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is either more BS from the Darwinistas or proof that we've been suffering with liberals for longer than previously thought.
1 posted on 05/09/2017 7:36:09 AM PDT by shove_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: shove_it

Barac married one.


2 posted on 05/09/2017 7:37:07 AM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

Ahhh....diversity...it existed 300,000 years ago.


3 posted on 05/09/2017 7:37:45 AM PDT by FrankR (FULL REPEAL, OR NO DEAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

The Origins of the demonicRAT Party.


4 posted on 05/09/2017 7:38:03 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

What was that region called? Chicago?


6 posted on 05/09/2017 7:38:36 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

Cain slew Able, then went off to the hinterland and hooked up with some broad. I always wandered how and who.


7 posted on 05/09/2017 7:40:46 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it
I have a question. We are the species "Homo sapiens." We have four races - Black, Caucasian, Asian/Pacific Islander, and Hispanic

Before us was the species "Homo erectus." Did they they have multiple races? If not, why not? If they were a single race...what race was it.

If Homo sapiens is the only species with multiple races, why didn't any previous species have multiple races?

11 posted on 05/09/2017 7:48:19 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

Hey it is hard work faking up all those fossils and making them register as 300,000 years old.

In order to... um, what purpose was that again?


12 posted on 05/09/2017 7:48:25 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (The Civil Rights movement compared content of their character to skin color and chose the latter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

What strikes me is that all other species of humans are extinct and modern humans struggled early on. I consider it evidence that the probability of a technological civilization developing anywhere in the Universe is extremely low.


15 posted on 05/09/2017 7:53:49 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it
Early humans co-existed in Africa with human-like species 300,000 years ago

We still do...................

16 posted on 05/09/2017 7:55:48 AM PDT by Red Badger (Profanity is the sound of an ignorant mind trying to express itself.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

1) Is Naledi really a separate species, especially if the dating is accurate? 2) What if the dating isn’t accurate?


17 posted on 05/09/2017 7:56:06 AM PDT by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

We’re still dealing with those small-brained human-like species.


22 posted on 05/09/2017 8:08:01 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it
Hominins are an extinct group of the same genus as humans, the only surviving members of that category today. Man's nearest living relatives, chimpanzees and gorillas, are further removed from Homo sapiens biologically than hominins are.

Wrong!

Wikipedia:

All species of the genus Homo plus those species of the australopithecines that arose after the split from Pan are called hominins.

Thus, modern humans (members of the species Homos sapiens - which is NOT extinct!) are likewise hominins.

Apparently, the author is confused, and believes that hominins are only the non-human members of the tribe Hominini, but in fact it also includes all members of the genus Homo.

Regards,

29 posted on 05/09/2017 8:32:08 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

Yeah, but how many were LGBTQ? That’s the IMPORTANT thing....


31 posted on 05/09/2017 8:35:45 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

They obviously didn’t study LA, Chicago, NY, Baltimore, or DC.... still happening.


34 posted on 05/09/2017 8:44:07 AM PDT by Feckless (The US Gubbmint / This Tagline CENSORED by FR \ IrOnic, ain't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it
when Homo naledi went extinct, and why, remains unanswered

They tasted good.

35 posted on 05/09/2017 8:44:48 AM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

I think they have them confused with the people from the Battlestar Galatica
https://jamesviscosi.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/galactica_crew_on_earth.png
https://www.overthinkingit.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Early-Man-in-BSG-300x169.jpg


37 posted on 05/09/2017 8:58:37 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

I studied some anthropology in college and there was a split of homo sapien at one point. The split of homo erectus sapien sapien and Paranthropus has already been determined. Paranthropus was closer to what we understgand as a description of a gorilla at between 4 and 5 feet tall and was a hunter of animals for food. Sapien sapien was tree dweller and came out at night to feed as a vegetarian and other very small things. Both used tools and intermingled. Paranthropus lasted over a million years until food sources changed and it couldn’t adapt. Sapien is what we have evolved into today.

rwood


41 posted on 05/09/2017 9:19:44 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it
Early humans co-existed in Africa with human-like species 300,000 years ago

We still do that today here in the USA and Europe.

43 posted on 05/09/2017 9:22:58 AM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

I bet that Al Sharp-tone has this thread pulled in
5-4-3-2-1 !!


44 posted on 05/09/2017 10:03:44 AM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

Meh, “homo naledi” has a standard primate skull (small brain), standard primate hips (non bipedal), standard primate hands (non tool using)... in other words it was a monkey, not an “early human”.

There’s also no evidence they practiced burial. They just found a bunch of their bones in a cave (not buried).


46 posted on 05/09/2017 10:07:05 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson