Load of crap. Saying they interfere with US interests. The problem is that our interests are supporting Sunni theocracy, expanding nato directly up to Russias border. Demanding access to their people for our NGOs to start destabilization efforts, and demanding they kiss the western bankers ring. Oh, and also they must “freely” install a western puppet as leader.
In short, our leaders are bond villains wanting world domination, and only need a cat to stroke.
Load of crap. Saying they interfere with US interests.
Load of crap. Aiding an Islamic theocratic state that has a long history of murdering Americans with a nuclear program is clearly against US interests... and everyone else's.
The problem is that our interests are supporting Sunni theocracy,
We're not helping the Sunnis with a nuclear program. Meanwhile, Russia's been supporting a Shiite theocracy - and so was Obama. Obama lifting sanctions to help Iran conduct more terrorism and get the bomb certainly wasn't in the interests of any Sunni theocracy. Obama releasing billions of dollars to aid Iran in its aggressive endeavors certainly wasn't benefitting any Sunnis. I'd love to hear from you how this helped Sunnis.
expanding nato directly up to Russias border.
Well, since we still have Cuba, friendly as ever to the Russians not far from where I sit, and Alaska butts up next to Russia in the far north, and Russia's been planting their flag off the coast of Canada under the ice trying to claim their continental shelf as its own, we shouldn't cut the Russians any slack on that, nor reward them with territory. These countries have a right to look out for their own interests ; it should be no surprise that they view becoming vassal states of the Russians is not in their interests. It is out of their long experience and quite justified fear of Russian expansionism that they seek NATO membership- it's not being forced on them. Russia only has itself to blame for these countries' interest in NATO, since it is according to Pootie Poot himself that Russia intends to recreate the Soviet Union - which of course means to subjugate eastern Europe as before under the one-way Warsaw Pact. And to do that he has been using military force to invade and take territory he could not gain through peaceful persuasion.
Demanding access to their people for our NGOs to start destabilization efforts,
These places were stable? Russia's a better talent at destabilization than we'll ever be... they just don't call Spetznatz an NGO.
and demanding they kiss the western bankers ring.
So instead of western loans, groveling at the feet of Russian oligarchs holding a gun to their head is better?
Oh, and also they must “freely” install a western puppet as leader.
An election is not the installation of a puppet. A Russian invasion is. The US has never threatened to cut off the energy supplies of any European state to manipulate its foreign policy.
In short, our leaders are bond villains wanting world domination, and only need a cat to stroke.
But you, like George Bush, looked into his soul, and discovered that Pootie Poot is not a villain but is really a nice guy... in spite of assassinating his opponents in the most grisly and unique ways, in spite of decades of service in the KGB funding US antiwar groups so they can undermine our security, in spite of helping Saddam Hussein with his weapons programs even as Saddam was running people through plastic shredders and infiltrating Europe with spy cells to assassinate dissidents, helping Iran with their nuclear program even as Iran was blowing up Kobar Towers, even when it was sending teams of IRGC fighters into Iraq to set IEDs to dismember US soldiers and slaughter Iraqi police, and even when Iran's Hezbollah was helping al Qaeda with their bomb design to sink the USS The Sullivans and the USS Cole; Putin's such a nice guy, importing North Korean slaves to work the timber in the far east without pay, allowing North Korea to keep the slaves in camps under Nork guard so as to prevent escape; and the " niceguy" invaded what, four countries in the last couple years, without a peep of protst from an accomodating Obama...even recently this paragon of virtue has been threatening the Scandinavian states, threatening the Baltic states, and threatening Poland... none of which are a threat to the Russians in any way, shape, or form.
Why is it you think it's bad for countries to freely join NATO but somehow OK for the Russians to use force to prevent it ... to assassinate opposition candidates and journalists, threaten to cut off heating oil if they don't get their way, and forcibly expand their control until their tanks overlook western states?