Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

That report about Seth Rich, the slain DNC staffer, is hot hunk of hokum
Washington Examiner ^ | | May 16, 2017,4:05 PM | Updated May 16, 2017, 9:30 PM | by Becket Adams

Posted on 05/21/2017 12:10:08 PM PDT by ckilmer

That report about Seth Rich, the slain DNC staffer, is hot hunk of hokum

by Becket Adams | May 16, 2017, 4:05 PM | Updated May 16, 2017, 9:30 PM

The only thing that has been accomplished with this latest story is that the people involved have angered a still-grieving family. (Twitter)
The only thing that has been accomplished with this latest story is that the people involved have angered a still-grieving family. (Twitter)

Recommended for You

One last time: That Seth Rich story is garbage

Trump 'furious' at Guilfoyle's bid for Spicer's job, 'She's using us'

GOP fears Trump will take the Republican Party down with him

DNC blames Trump's backing of Erdogan for attack outside DC embassy

Camille Paglia: Democrats are colluding with the media to create chaos

Most Read Articles

FEC boss who tried to muzzle Drudge now on Soros payroll

Trump 'furious' at Guilfoyle's bid for Spicer's job, 'She's using us'

GOP fears Trump will take the Republican Party down with him

Anderson Cooper to Jeffrey Lord: You'd defend Trump if he 'took a dump on his desk'

Camille Paglia: Democrats are colluding with the media to create chaos
That new report alleging collusion between WikiLeaks and Seth Rich, the Democratic National Committee staffer who was murdered near his home in Washington, D.C., last year, isn't what you think it is.

At least, that's what Rich's family and law enforcement officials said Tuesday. Also, that's basically what the source of the report's biggest claim said after he recanted most of his story.

Susan Ferrechio interviews Senator Rob Portman
Watch Full Screen
In short, the report is a hot hunk of hokum.

"We are a family who is committed to facts, not fake evidence that surfaces every few months to fill the void and distract law enforcement and the general public from finding Seth's murderers," the Rich family said through spokesman Brad Bauman.

Bauman, whose body of work includes consultation services to Democratic candidates, said separately in a comment to Business Insider: "It's sad but unsurprising that a group of media outlets who have repeatedly lied to the American people would try and manipulate the legacy of a murder victim in order to forward their own political agenda."

"I think there is a special place in hell for people like that," he added.

The young DNC staffer was murdered on July 10. His death has not yet been solved, and law enforcement officials say they have no promising leads.

This iteration of the Seth Rich news cycle begins with Rod Wheeler, an ex-D.C. homicide detective who works now as a private investigator and occasional Fox News contributor.

Wheeler told Washington, D.C., Fox News affiliate Fox 5 that he had information showing the slain DNC data analyst was in contact with WikiLeaks prior to his murder.

WikiLeaks, of course, published thousands of stolen emails in 2016 that had been pilfered from accounts belonging to Democratic National Committee staffers and failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta.

Asked whether his sources have said Rich was tied directly to WikiLeaks, Wheeler told Fox 5, "Absolutely. Yeah. That's confirmed."

Wheeler also said he believed local authorities were conducting a cover-up.

Law enforcement officials, who maintain Rich was the victim of a botched robbery, denied this charge (again).

FoxNews.com reported separately Tuesday that the murdered staffer was in contact with WikiLeaks via the late journalist Gavin MacFadyen. Rich reportedly handed over 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments belonging to top DNC staffers to MacFadyen before May 21, FoxNews.com reported, citing a nameless federal official.

The FBI conducted a forensic report on Rich's laptop within 96 hours of his death, the anonymous official reported said.

This is where everything falls apart for the Fox reporters.

Wheeler recanted most of his story Tuesday evening. He told CNN he had no proof that Rich was ever in contact with WikiLeaks.

CNN reported:

Wheeler instead said he only learned about the possible existence of such evidence through the reporter he spoke to for the FoxNews.com story. He explained that the comments he made to WTTG-TV were intended to simply preview Fox News' Tuesday story.
[…]
Asked about a quote attributed to him in the Fox News story in which he said his "investigation up to this point shows there was some degree of email exchange between Seth Rich and Wikileaks," Wheeler said he was referring to information that had already been reported in the media.

"I only got that [information] from the reporter at Fox News," Wheeler told CNN.

The family spokesman stressed Wheeler had never actually seen Rich's laptop.

NBC News also reported Tuesday that separate FBI sources contradict everything in the Fox 5 and FoxNews.com stories.

"[A] current FBI official and a former one completely discount the Fox News claim that an FBI analysis of a computer belonging to Rich contained thousands of e-mails to and from WikiLeaks," the report read. "Local police in Washington, D.C., never even gave the FBI Rich's laptop to analyze after his murder."

Simply put, in regards to Rich's laptop, "It never contained any e-mails related to WikiLeaks, and the FBI never had it," a former law enforcement official with direct knowledge of the case said.

Lastly, the Rich family itself has been loudest and most vocal in disputing what they say are "unsubstantiated" garbage reports.

"We see no facts, we have seen no evidence, we have been approached with no emails and only learned about this when contacted by the press," the statement added. "Even if tomorrow an email was found, it is not a high enough bar of evidence to prove any interactions as emails can be altered, and we've seen that those interested in pushing conspiracies will stop at nothing to do so."

The family's statement added:

The services of the private investigator who spoke to press was offered to the Rich family and paid for by a third party, and contractually was barred from speaking to press or anyone outside of law enforcement or the family unless explicitly authorized by the family.

The "third party" mentioned in the statement is financial adviser and Fox News contributor Ed Butowsky, Bauman told NBC News Tuesday.

However, Butowsky has denied any part in Wheeler's investigation of Rich's death.

"I'm not involved with any of what you said," he told NBC.

Butowsky declined to respond when he was asked if he was in contact with the Rich family.

"This can't possibly go well," he said. "I didn't pay anybody. I didn't hire anybody."

He then referred all questions to Wheeler.

Bauman tells a different story.

Not only did Butowsky connect the Rich family to Wheeler, but he also offered to pay the private investigator's fees, according to Bauman.

Though the family's initial response to the Fox 5 report declined to mention Butowsky by name, Bauman told NBC News he felt compelled to reveal the Dallas-based financial adviser's role as the "third party" after he denied involvement in the story.

"He's the one who paid for it," Bauman said.

To sum things up: The supposed bombshell reports this week are trash.

They have done nothing to answer some of the conspiracies surrounding Rich's unsolved murder. They have, however, done a great job of infuriating the victim's still-grieving family.

Great work all around, fellas.

This story, which warned from the outset that the two Fox reports didn't add up, has been updated to include Wheeler's admission to CNN.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: democrat; josephpcapone; louscitybar; rich; sethrich; slaindncstaffer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: txhurl

>Proof will be given Tues. by Kim Dotcom.

It’s really dumb to put faith in Kim Dotcom.


21 posted on 05/21/2017 12:45:46 PM PDT by JohnyBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: smalltownslick
So the FBI never had the laptop, but are very certain what’s not on it.

You have a problem with that? So do I.

and with google "losing" gmail I send to friends re this case.

22 posted on 05/21/2017 12:47:09 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely expressed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Anybody who can watch that interview and not understand what JA is saying is very fake news. Also the 20k reward put up by wikileaks, cause they put out reward money for random strangers all the time./s


23 posted on 05/21/2017 12:51:26 PM PDT by magglepuss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Sorry, but ‘the family’ is the VERY LEAST of concerns when a public figure dies in a non-natural way. They’re certainly welcome to grieve...and whine, but when a public figure is possibly killed (as in many cases) or is definitely killed (as in this case), the family is simply OUT OF LUCK.

No different than Ted Kennedy saying something “Don’t bother investigating because it hurts our feelings” when his brother, JFK, gets shot. Sorry Ted - but it doesn’t work that way. Political assassinations are SERIOUS BUSINESS and will be investigated...or at least, sure as hell should be investigated.


24 posted on 05/21/2017 12:54:39 PM PDT by BobL (In Honor of the NeverTrumpers, I declare myself as FR's first 'Imitation NeverTrumper')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Claimed “HOKUM”, but no FACTS to back up their claim... heh heh


25 posted on 05/21/2017 12:58:24 PM PDT by hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998 (------>VMFA 235- '69-'72 KMCAS <------- "Death Angels")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Well, you really don’t know one way or the other and neither does anyone else. The Examiner may be correct and no one else on FreeRepublic knows either. Anyone who tries to rebut or confirm does not know either.


26 posted on 05/21/2017 1:00:33 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

27 posted on 05/21/2017 1:01:28 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Hey Becket, why hasn’t the DNC offered a reward for Seth’s killer?

Let me know when you find out.

5.56mm


28 posted on 05/21/2017 1:03:15 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magglepuss

Exactly. The Washington Examiner story was pure fakery because they didn’t even mention what Assange has said on the subject. The DC mouthpieces wouldn’t be going full throttle propaganda if they weren’t terrified of the Seth Rich story. It’s not going away.


29 posted on 05/21/2017 1:03:52 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

Assange knows. See posts 14 and 17.


30 posted on 05/21/2017 1:06:24 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

A biased source who found Larry Sinclair (the man who spent a weekend giving oral sex to Obama while the latter smoked crack) and offered to vindicate him with a lie detector test falsified the results to discredit him. It would be simple to offer to help the Rich family find the truth, and then lead them astray.


31 posted on 05/21/2017 1:09:07 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

As well as the Kopechne family, the Kennedys.


32 posted on 05/21/2017 1:10:04 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner

The doc didn’t “operate” on Rich.


33 posted on 05/21/2017 1:17:43 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

What gives this the most credibility in my mind to the Rich/Assuage connection are the statements from the WikiLeaks founder himself...


34 posted on 05/21/2017 1:18:01 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Well, he can’t prove it. I am well aware of what Assange has said dating back to last summer. He has offered no proof.


35 posted on 05/21/2017 1:30:06 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

‘Well, he can’t prove it.’

Idk what you can possibly mean by this comment. Assange is the one who received the leaks. He, of all people, knows who he got them from.


36 posted on 05/21/2017 1:33:36 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I wouldn’t call the Examiner conservative.


37 posted on 05/21/2017 1:40:22 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL
It hasn't been established that Seth Rich really is a "public figure" rather than a 27-year-old who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

The family can't stop people from speculating about what happened, but they're going to be involved and have their say, until the matter is cleared up -- if it ever is.

Today, everybody comments about everything. The family can't and shouldn't shut outsiders up, but they have more right than anybody to say what's on their mind when it comes to their son or brother.

38 posted on 05/21/2017 1:49:13 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: x

Can you imagine the media orgasm if this was a Russian connected to Trump? But instead it involves the DNC and its shenanigans so the MSM shoves it down the rabbit hole. Nothing to see here folks. Oh look Trump demands two scoops!!!!


39 posted on 05/21/2017 1:58:38 PM PDT by JayElBee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Not necessary to rebut point by point. I completely accept the articles appeal to authority and use of a DNC PR flack.


40 posted on 05/21/2017 2:05:30 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson