Posted on 05/21/2017 12:10:08 PM PDT by ckilmer
>Proof will be given Tues. by Kim Dotcom.
It’s really dumb to put faith in Kim Dotcom.
You have a problem with that? So do I.
and with google "losing" gmail I send to friends re this case.
Anybody who can watch that interview and not understand what JA is saying is very fake news. Also the 20k reward put up by wikileaks, cause they put out reward money for random strangers all the time./s
Sorry, but ‘the family’ is the VERY LEAST of concerns when a public figure dies in a non-natural way. They’re certainly welcome to grieve...and whine, but when a public figure is possibly killed (as in many cases) or is definitely killed (as in this case), the family is simply OUT OF LUCK.
No different than Ted Kennedy saying something “Don’t bother investigating because it hurts our feelings” when his brother, JFK, gets shot. Sorry Ted - but it doesn’t work that way. Political assassinations are SERIOUS BUSINESS and will be investigated...or at least, sure as hell should be investigated.
Claimed “HOKUM”, but no FACTS to back up their claim... heh heh
Well, you really don’t know one way or the other and neither does anyone else. The Examiner may be correct and no one else on FreeRepublic knows either. Anyone who tries to rebut or confirm does not know either.
Hey Becket, why hasn’t the DNC offered a reward for Seth’s killer?
Let me know when you find out.
5.56mm
Exactly. The Washington Examiner story was pure fakery because they didn’t even mention what Assange has said on the subject. The DC mouthpieces wouldn’t be going full throttle propaganda if they weren’t terrified of the Seth Rich story. It’s not going away.
Assange knows. See posts 14 and 17.
A biased source who found Larry Sinclair (the man who spent a weekend giving oral sex to Obama while the latter smoked crack) and offered to vindicate him with a lie detector test falsified the results to discredit him. It would be simple to offer to help the Rich family find the truth, and then lead them astray.
As well as the Kopechne family, the Kennedys.
The doc didn’t “operate” on Rich.
What gives this the most credibility in my mind to the Rich/Assuage connection are the statements from the WikiLeaks founder himself...
Well, he can’t prove it. I am well aware of what Assange has said dating back to last summer. He has offered no proof.
‘Well, he can’t prove it.’
Idk what you can possibly mean by this comment. Assange is the one who received the leaks. He, of all people, knows who he got them from.
I wouldn’t call the Examiner conservative.
The family can't stop people from speculating about what happened, but they're going to be involved and have their say, until the matter is cleared up -- if it ever is.
Today, everybody comments about everything. The family can't and shouldn't shut outsiders up, but they have more right than anybody to say what's on their mind when it comes to their son or brother.
Can you imagine the media orgasm if this was a Russian connected to Trump? But instead it involves the DNC and its shenanigans so the MSM shoves it down the rabbit hole. Nothing to see here folks. Oh look Trump demands two scoops!!!!
Not necessary to rebut point by point. I completely accept the articles appeal to authority and use of a DNC PR flack.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.