To: ForYourChildren
To: ForYourChildren
But has he ever used Russian dressing on his salad??? That would prove it once and for all!!!
3 posted on
05/24/2017 9:09:27 PM PDT by
jdsteel
(Give me freedom not more government.)
To: ForYourChildren
Are we going to start getting allusions to treason because the President meets with the Russian Ambassador or, Heaven forfend! with the head Russian himself?
4 posted on
05/24/2017 9:12:39 PM PDT by
arthurus
To: ForYourChildren
Sheeesh.
Read the article from CNN. All about massive Sessions relationship with the Russians and how Sessions is hiding it.
Unreal.
CNN #FAKENEWS
CNN journalists #FAKEAMERICANS
9 posted on
05/24/2017 9:23:04 PM PDT by
ForYourChildren
(Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
To: ForYourChildren
Schumer needs to get a job at the Onion, his exploits are genuinely more ridiculous than fiction.
10 posted on
05/24/2017 9:23:26 PM PDT by
Nateman
(If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
To: ForYourChildren
CNN trots this out every few weeks. They’re due for another “scandal timeline” story. When there is no news they generate it, they must keep the aura of scandal alive. And they wonder why they’re called FAKE NEWS.
12 posted on
05/24/2017 9:34:52 PM PDT by
Ray76
(DRAIN THE SWAMP)
To: ForYourChildren
It says right on the form "except in your official duties ", or words to that affect.
For the libs on here that means Sessions doesn't have to report anyone he contacted while a Senator.
Ed
13 posted on
05/24/2017 10:49:50 PM PDT by
husky ed
(FOX NEWS ALERT "Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead" THIS HAS BEEN A FOX NEWS ALERT)
To: ForYourChildren
Ignore CNN, they are FAKE NEWS.
CNN = Fake News
14 posted on
05/25/2017 1:51:29 AM PDT by
blam
To: ForYourChildren
Sessions did not mention the meetings, which took place as part of Sessions official duties as a United States Senator, on his SF-86 An SF-86 does not ask for a list of meetings. It says
"Do you have, or have you had, close and/or continuing contact with a foreign national within the last seven (7) years with whom you, or your spouse, or cohabitant are bound by affection, influence, common interests, and/or obligation? Include associates as well as relatives, not previously listed in Section 18" (Section 18 is for relatives).
https://www.opm.gov/forms/pdf_fill/sf86-non508.pdf
17 posted on
05/25/2017 5:29:07 AM PDT by
palmer
(turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure)
To: ForYourChildren
What they don't understand is that private citizens, who haven't had such contacts as politicians do in the normal course of business, have to be more thorough and Sessions started listing them and was told he didn't have to - the interview with an investigator would have covered anything that they wanted/needed to know about.
They are like those who have never read the Bible but want to argue against what it says - ignorance is what ignorance does....
20 posted on
05/25/2017 6:01:31 AM PDT by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson