Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

D.C., Maryland announce they're suing Trump over foreign payments to his business
CBS News ^ | June 12, 2017 | Rebbeca Shabad

Posted on 06/12/2017 10:23:46 AM PDT by Rennes Templar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: vette6387

I agree - The Capital needs to be downsized.


41 posted on 06/12/2017 1:51:55 PM PDT by WMarshal (President Trump, a president keeping his promises to the American people. It feels like winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
Well, not so fast: DOJ: Trump can accept payments from foreign governments.
42 posted on 06/12/2017 1:58:00 PM PDT by upchuck (... you might not be interested in Shariah; however Shariah is interested in you. h/t dogcaller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Yeah everybody wants to move to a public place to be slandered by as many swamp dwellers as possible, what’s not to like!


43 posted on 06/12/2017 2:05:05 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Way past time to enact LOSER PAYS.


44 posted on 06/12/2017 2:48:09 PM PDT by House Atreides (Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
More groundless piling on from a couple swamp dwellers.

This is absurd. Trump is not "accepting" emoluments. An emolument is a "salary, fee, or payment for employment" not a payment for service or goods rendered by a business.

Trump's businesses are a SEPARATE entity from TRUMP, not Trump himself. The businesses themselves are the "person," albeit a "fictitious" entity under law, that receives the payment from anyone doing business with them. As such, it is not Trump, the individual, who is being "paid by these governments," even if such payments were truly being paid.

If this kind of payment from foreign sources were the intended law, then any business payments made from any foreign source would be almost impossible to be associated with any government official in our government. It would preclude ANY person from the private sector from ever running for office without completely divesting himself or herself of every private investment. That, obviously, was not the intention of the emoluments clause. The emoluments clause was to prevent the direct payment of our officials for their direct services, or that could, in any way, be reflected in relation to their official duties. Revenues that are part of the normal course of business, especially those businesses which an official is no longer controlling, or merely has an ownership interest in, were not intended to be included.

45 posted on 06/12/2017 3:04:26 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
Aren’t we talking about payment for services - not contribution??

It isn't even payment TO Trump, but to an entity that is NOT the individual named Donald J. Trump but a fictitious corporate entity that may be owned in part by Donald J. Trump, that pays him, from time to time, a dividend from the profits IT earns and then distributes to its investors. That's a round-a-bout payment method that is quite a bit diluted from the payments these governments.

46 posted on 06/12/2017 3:11:26 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Baseless.

These people need to be taken to the wood shed.

5.56mm


47 posted on 06/12/2017 3:12:45 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC
Hey! I didn't read any article in Science announcing that California managed to clone itself. Yet here we have equally insane libtard entities D.C. and Maryland making public morons of themselves, just like California. Or is it the result of some infectious agent, perhaps an as-yet undiscovered prion, that people are still needing comfort from the election results 6 months later, that people are attempting to divert the President's time and attention from actually important matters of running an effective government, and that people WANT to do without so that they can support every illegal invader that manages to drag their rear end over the border?

My girlfriend, Kathy, and I came up with the correct diagnosis in 2014. We have even written it un to be included in the next addenda to the IDC-10.

321.0 SPLAT Liberal Cerebral Defenestration (LCD) or Liberal Acquired Brain Absence (LABA), complete loss of rationality, cognition, and cerebration due to indiscriminately keeping one's mind so far open that the brain falls out. First and subsequent encounters.

And, yes, it is infectious among Liberals. Conservatism is the only known preventive and treatment for its symptoms.

48 posted on 06/12/2017 3:22:10 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Do Trump’s businesses have investors? They are not publicly traded.


49 posted on 06/12/2017 3:22:46 PM PDT by Freee-dame (Best election ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Freee-dame
Do Trump’s businesses have investors? They are not publicly traded.

Sure they do. Trump is often not even the majority owner. Often he is in partnership with other investors, but his name will be on the property do to his imprimatur. His casinos were operated that way. Often his hotels are partnerships. Most of his holdings are corporations, but they don't have to be publicly traded to be held by other investors as well as Trump. Trump would be extremely foolish to hold ANYTHING as a sole proprietor. The liability exposure would be too risky.

That's why Trump, himself, has never gone bankrupt but businesses he's been involved with have done so four times. He's come out unscathed. It was the CORPORATE entities that went under. Trump lost his investment in those businesses (or part of it) but never his whole net worth. The fictitious entity of those four corporations filed the bankruptcies, not Trump. In fact, if I recall correctly, in most of them, Trump had a less than 10% interest. . . but his name was on them.

50 posted on 06/12/2017 3:31:50 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla
There will be another 3 1/2 years of these continued assaults

... all which are carefully crafted and on a "trickle-out" schedule to accomplish the Left's objective to derail President Trump's plans to Make America Great Again.

The Left's strategy is both to attack the President directly -- to distract him (which isn't working as well as the Democrat heel-nippers hoped it would) -- and to provide the Republican Party leaders in Congress a reason -- really, an excuse -- to drag their collective feet on implementing and funding President Trump's plans (which, in the minds of the Democrat Left as well as the GOP leadership, is having some measure of "success" in delaying MAGA).

51 posted on 06/12/2017 3:38:38 PM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Frivolous lawsuits - Is there any violation of law for which people like these can be charged??


52 posted on 06/12/2017 3:58:15 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
Frivolous lawsuits - Is there any violation of law for which people like these can be charged??

Barratry?

Vexatious litigation or the incitement of it.

53 posted on 06/12/2017 4:32:34 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Much of Trump’s Business is Branding. People pay to use his Name on their Holdings and Products.

Liberals think Trump makes stuff, he doesn’t. He lends his Name to a Product and gets a piece of the action. He does own the Winery that makes his Brand though.

Remember Johnny Carson Menswear? Johnny got a Check in the mail, he didn’t run a Clothing Sweatshop in China.

I’m waiting for them to sue him to make him change his Name. Too may people recognize it. LOL


54 posted on 06/12/2017 4:41:25 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Islamiphobia is a word created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons.” Christopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baltimorepoet

Frosch is a neo-Marxist little shit who did then Mayor O’Malley’s dirty work against both state and federal opponents.

He needs to be impeached or charged with malfeasance of office, wasting the state’s taxpayers funds, malicious prosecution, and just being a nasty typical Democratic Good Nazi/German Prosecutor like those who sent so many Jews and other innocent German citizens to concentration camps and death.


55 posted on 06/12/2017 6:15:24 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

Yep, Trump supporters/ Deplorables really really need to organize. How that’s accomplished I don’t know but if it occurred there would be some power to push back.


56 posted on 06/12/2017 7:38:26 PM PDT by crager (I went to look for myself and if I happen to return while I'm gone tell me to wait.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

He died of natural causes. No need for an autopsy or an investigation. Lack of gun control laws killed Seth Rich.


57 posted on 06/13/2017 12:42:13 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; Bigg Red; ...

Fr0sh, the giant pimple on Maryland’s behind, is back!

Maryland “Freak State” PING!


58 posted on 06/13/2017 11:38:18 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (April 2006 Message from Dan http://www.dansimmons.com/news/message/2006_04.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baltimorepoet

“The state of Maryland needs a damned enema. Too many sewage-dwellers living here and running things.”

will marylander’s tax dollars be paying the salaries for these liberal progressive atty general lawyers when they pursue this ridiculous nuisance suit? and could the saner folk in maryland sue for misuse of their taxes?


59 posted on 06/13/2017 4:30:26 PM PDT by IWONDR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

I hope you are right, but doubt it.


60 posted on 06/14/2017 8:47:20 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson