Replies

Explain to me, from physics, how the plane can teeter on a fulcrum, both front to back and side to side, without actually being on a fulcrum. Perhaps you can explain it to the antagonistic physics professor who ultimately had to agree that the plane was on a fulcrum.

Explain to me, from physics, how multiple passengers held their bodies out of the water with their lifejacket either uninflated or high above the surface of the water. In Rosa’s case she was able to effortlessly stay up out of the water while her upper body was hunched over, even.

And while you’re at it you might want to remind one of the passengers that he shouldn’t say the ground was squishy there, because they’re all supposed to be pretending they couldn’t touch the ground. I suppose they are all Jesus, able to walk on water?

Oh, and you might want to tell the scientific community that their bathymetric maps are all inaccurate too.

We have shown this material to professional government investigators and to many skeptic laymen. Not one of them has said the analysis was flawed. Insiders have in fact DIRECTLY confirmed that it is NOT. A high-ranking military person has told us that this information would get us killed.

The video was highly edited. Anything that supports the narrative could easily be faked in the month between when the video was taken and when the public was allowed to see the highly-edited portions of it. Why do you think Puentes had two Go-Pros and additional equipment ready at the time the camera started rolling?

But it is the admissions against interest that were (accidentally? or was it Puentes’ life insurance?) left in the video and audio that need explaining. Like the things I mentioned above, which cemented the conclusions for those not on the deep-state propaganda payroll.

There are mismatched cuts all over the engine that was pulled from the water - cuts that don’t match the corresponding place from which the cut was supposedly made. IIRC something like 2 dozen cuts. One plane part was photographed shortly before this event, showing RECESSED screws. But what was pulled up showed PROTRUDING screws there instead.

Those are all admissions against interest - the strongest form of evidence there is. Evidence they simply forgot to manipulate. The NTSB did photoshop those images in their final report, to try to make the cuts less obvious. Unfortunately for them, they didn’t bother to do that until AFTER one of the passengers had already published the original images the NTSB had given him. Apparently us telling the NTSB about these problems led them not to investigate as is their job, but to obstruct justice by altering evidence in their official publication. That makes the NTSB accessories to the crimes committed. According to the audio in Puentes’ video, Clyde Kawasaki flew a plane with a normally-running engine into the ocean - scaring Loretta Fuddy to death as a result, according to the official narrative. If that is true, he could be guilty of manslaughter, and the NTSB (just like all the other federal, state, and local entities involved in this event) is an accomplice to the crime by committing perjury and obstruction of justice in order to hide what really happened.

But hey, I really don’t want to go round and round with you about this because it is a waste of time. I need to teach my husband how to put 5-year-old puzzles together. As many mistakes as I made, the deep-state jerks were still so afraid of me having time to make my FOIA requests, that they had to poison my husband so I would be kept busy keeping him clothed and in his right mind. I’m glad they never felt the need to sucker-punch Mother Teresa too. Nothing proves manly integrity like sucker-punching somebody 1/10th your size. Pathetic.

But getting me out of the picture was the worst thing these evil idiots could do, and it backfired. As a direct answer to prayer, I was able to pass the baton on to somebody much more qualified, much less distracted, and much more well-connected. The deep state thought if they put me in the ground it would end their problems, but the wheat that fell into the ground was replaced by something a million times better. The deep state is not fighting me; they are fighting THE TRUTH. They are fighting JUSTICE. They are fighting GOD. I am a peon; if they thought they could stop God by stopping me then they are of all people most to be pitied. God will not be mocked forever; a day of justice is inevitable.

We weren’t supposed to find that my husband had 4 times the toxic level of lead in his body tissues (or that my daughter had 3 times the toxic level). That was an “accident”, after I was told that black-ops poisons can mimic Alzheimers so I had them tested for heavy metals. Just one of many, many times I have seen that God is on the side of justice. You can run but you CANNOT hide. Tell that to your buddies.

But don’t bother to respond to me. I have much more important things to do than bang my head against a wall.

“Explain to me, from physics, how the plane can teeter on a fulcrum”

It’s not, it is floating and pivoting on the wings for the up and down motion and pivoting on the fuselage for the side to side motion.

“Perhaps you can explain it to the antagonistic physics professor who ultimately had to agree that the plane was on a fulcrum.”

What’s his name - when he sees the whole video I bet he changes his mind.

“Explain to me, from physics, how multiple passengers held their bodies out of the water with their lifejacket either uninflated or high above the surface of the water. In Rosa’s case she was able to effortlessly stay up out of the water while her upper body was hunched over, even.”

In the case of Rosa - she is floating on a seat cushion and lying on her stomach. So her head and shoulders are out of the water. In the case of Puentes, he is lying on his stomach and has to arch his back to keep his head out of water so his shoulder and head are out of the water. It would depend a lot on their personal center of gravity and center of buoyancy. They are not standing on anything.

“Oh, and you might want to tell the scientific community that their bathymetric maps are all inaccurate too.”

The maps are correct - the calculations that place the plane directly on top of the shoals is faulty.

“Why do you think Puentes had two Go-Pros and additional equipment ready at the time the camera started rolling?”

One GoPro on a monopole and one for in his hand. One in a waterproof case and one not. Pure speculation on both of our parts.

BTW, this other guy GoProed his commercial jet making a crash landing when a landing gear collapsed. It happens.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwYmMG61VDk

“that they had to poison my husband so I would be kept busy keeping him clothed and in his right mind.”

As I said before I’m sorry about your husbands situation. dementia is horrific disease that robs a person of their personality. But I have to ask. If the deep state wanted to quiet you - why poison your husband and not you? Seems counter-intuitive.

Butter:

Follow up to this comment you made,

"In Rosa’s case she was able to effortlessly stay up out of the water while her upper body was hunched over, even."

Rosa Key was able to stay up because she was floating on a seat cushion much like it was a boogie board.

At the 7:34 minute mark of the video, Rosa is seen riding a seat cushion:

At the 10:45 mark an underwater shot of her riding the seat cushion:

At the 13:17 mark her is another underwater image of her riding the seat cushion (two frames):

At one second later (13:18 mark) there is an above water image of her hunched over with the PFD out of the water.

Of course in none of the underwater images is the sea floor visible.

BTW, Ferdinand Puentes also was holding on to a seat cushion throughout his filming. It can be seen at the 9:52 mark and the 14:18 mark.