Posted on 07/08/2017 1:18:37 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Clinton campaign chair John Podesta was a board member of Joule Unlimited Technologies from 2010 through 2014. During that time Joule received $35 million from Rusnano, a state run Russian company tied to Putin.
Then there’s Uranium 1.
Then there’s Sberbank, Russia’s largest bank. Sberbank hired the Podesta Group, led by John and his brother Tony, to lobby Congress for the removal of sanctions.
Sberbank was also involved in the Uranium 1 deal.
It has been 8 months since the election and nobody has come up with one piece of evidence that the Russians had any affect whatsoever with the 2016 election.
Says the Russian agent.
</sarcasm>
I know Russia will put money into something, corrupt or not, if there's something real they get in return. I also know that a mouthful of promises from any of the Clintons isn't something a Russian would believe is a real return on their investment.
All Lou Dobbs wanted to know was, how do we know the Russians (or anyone else) hacked anything? What did they do that is proof? AND the reason we don't know is because the Democrats and Obama wouldn't (and still won't, for some reason) give the FBI etc. access to the hacked servers.
If John Bolton wants to know why he isn't on the Trump team at any capacity he can simply watch his own interview witk Dobbs as an example why.
The only point John Bolton wanted to make was Russia lies (DUH!). Yet, thanks to the Democrats (the biggest liars on the planet) he can't prove it.
It was insane. Almost as crazy at Lt. Col. Ralph Peters on there a couple of months ago.
I swear the neocons aren’t going to be happy without nuclear combat toe-to-toe with the Russkies.
Actually, only 2 of the 4 intel agencies attributed high confidence to the likelyhood of Russian agents actually penetrating the DNC server. The had to rely on the report by the Crowdstrike company that was hired by the DNC to investigate the email leaks since no intelligence agency directly examined the server. The Crowdstrike findings have been criticized by independent IT cyber attack professionals who concluded that the tools used to leak the emails were old, widely available from “dark net” sources and did not contain anything that could conclusively tie them to Russian agents or locations. This was simply assumed by Crowdstrike because they had seen this exploit used on Ukranian cell phones. The basis of this conclusion has been debunked by Ukranian officials. So the entire intelligence report is a house of cards based on unsubstantiated claims by Crowdstrike. The left is hoping that if they repeat the meme that “Russia hacked the election” often enough on network news shows that if won’t matter if it was true or false.
I'm also sure that someone can request bids for hacking a specific target and settle on one that meets their budget if any of the bids aren't more than they can afford.
Last but not least, I'm sure the NSA buys twenty times more hacking tools than they've ever created or can create and I seriously doubt the find out the true identity of most of the persons they buy from.
After all, the government and media both only pump out what they want you to know and it's only a coincidence if any of it is the truth.
JMHo
I haven’t seen one scrap of evidence. Have you?
I put the end sarcasm tag there for a reason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.