Want to fight climate change? Have fewer children

theguardian.com ^

[Theophilus]

too late twelve.

[MAGAthon]

the study is recommending US, EU, Canada and Australia have fewer children, when these countries have some of the lowest birthrates in the world!

12 Jul: Breitbart: Oliver JJ Lane: Guardian: Save The Planet, Have Fewer Children
Having children is a “lifestyle choice” to be discouraged among young people in developed nations and is bad for the planet, according to a new paper trailed positively by the British left-wing Guardian newspaper...
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/07/12/guardian-save-the-planet-have-fewer-children/

[oldasrocks]

Throw a liberal in a volcano and hope he/she is a virgin. Since volcanoes cause 95% ofglobal warming this might help.

[grey_whiskers]

[samtheman]

Correct

[ek_hornbeck]

Oh no, can’t have fewer babies...gotta have those african mothers pinch off 7-8 kids each on average ...

You've probably also noticed that "environmentalist" left-wingers only complain about overpopulation when it's white westerners having children, in spite of the fact that women in most developed nations aren't even having children at replacement level while in Third World countries, your average woman seems to have anywhere from a half dozen to a full dozen. Yet the environmentalists Left seldom if ever complains about the high fertilities of women in Sub-Saharan Africa, the Arab world, or Central America, all the while whining about how American families with 2 children leave too much of a "Carbon footprint".

Similarly, "green" advocates of population control walk hand in hand with fellow leftists who advocate open borders - in spite of mass Third World immigration being the biggest contribution to population growth in the western world.

In other words, all this talk about being "green" and "protecting the planet" has nothing to do with "the environment" - it's just another tool to be used to crush western nations and enable Third World nations and peoples.