Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Megyn Kelly Sinks To New Ratings Low Amid Reports She Is “Really Worried” About Her Future At NBC
thegatewaypundit ^ | Joshua Caplan

Posted on 07/17/2017 10:06:27 AM PDT by davikkm

Things are not going well for Megyn Kelly. The NBC host’s show “Sunday Night with Megyn Kelly” has sunk to a new ratings low.

Variety reports:

Earlier in the night at 7 p.m. on NBC, “Sunday Night with Megyn Kelly” drew a 0.4 rating and 3.1 million viewers, the newsmagazine’s lowest total viewer number since it debuted at the beginning of June. Kelly also matched a series low in the key demo.

For CBS, a new episode of “Big Brother” (1.8, 6 million) was even with last week’s Sunday airing. “Candy Crush” aired at 9 p.m., followed by a repeat of “NCIS: Los Angeles.”

NBC aired only repeats with the exception of “Sunday Night with Megyn Kelly.”

Kelly is reportedly panicking over her ratings slide, attempting to reach out to former colleagues for advice on how to reverse the trend.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bimbo; howardstern; lingeriemodel; megynnbc; nbcnews; trashtv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last
To: nickcarraway

We will have to disagree about that. Do you believe in Russia collusion, in addition to Megyn collusion?


81 posted on 07/17/2017 11:33:52 AM PDT by Defiant (The media is the colostomy bag where truth goes after democrats digest it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Coming soon to a street corner near you...


82 posted on 07/17/2017 11:34:56 AM PDT by mywholebodyisaweapon (Thank God for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loveliberty2

“Me Again” Kelly.

When a guy with the Super Ego of Bill O’Reilly can mock you with a nickname like that; you know you’ve gone too far.


83 posted on 07/17/2017 11:35:19 AM PDT by Reagan80 ("In this current crisis, government is not the solution to our problems, government IS the problem")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cats1

The media wanted Trump all the way. They did everything possible to negate the other 16 candidates.


84 posted on 07/17/2017 11:35:47 AM PDT by nickcarraway (O'Donnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: dead

Perhaps you read only the first sentence of my comment, and not the next one: “They didn’t need to support him, they just needed not to be actively working against him, up to and including the election.” Yes, that’s how all news should be, factual and accurate.

But then, there are also opinion shows, like Hannity, O’Reilly, Tucker, and, formerly, MeAgain. Other than Hannity, who was supportive, and O’Reilly, who was coy and playing both sides, opinion shows on Fox, and their choice of guests and moderators, was something like 80 percent anti-trump. Their so-called Republicans, like Hume, Baier, Krautie, etc. were all virulent nevertrumpers. That didn’t have to be like that, and it would not have impacted the truthful reporting of the news to favor Trump or at least be 50/50 in the reporting.

Networks and newspapers have another way to show their bias, and it’s not just in the reporting of stories that may be factual. It is in their choice of what to report, and what not to report. So, for example, never reporting illegal alien crimes or inner city crime statistics or failure of their schools, or reporting on how bad the economy really is, or on the truth about Benghazi, these are all decisions that are made by the dozens ever day and which show an overwhelming bias against Trump and conservatives (real ones, not Faux ones like Bill Krystol and NR).

Where are you going to go to get the news reported and dumb opinion kept silent when what is reported is the reflection of a dumb opinion? Had Fox been fair to Trump on what it reported and how it reported it, as I said, that is all that we would ask. Instead, it was a barrage of anti-Trump stories and opinions, sent at us like cannon-shots.

What you ask for shows a lack of understanding about how the propaganda machine is running today.


85 posted on 07/17/2017 11:45:09 AM PDT by Defiant (The media is the colostomy bag where truth goes after democrats digest it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Raise you hands if you are not surprised by this! Hand up! No way she was going to get ratings.


86 posted on 07/17/2017 11:46:54 AM PDT by ColdOne ((I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Best Election Ever! “Laughing my #Ossoff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

“I still love watching the video of the sick look on her face when it was announced on Fox News that Trump had won the election.”

Look on Megyn Kelly’s face when Trump won the election... PRICELESS


87 posted on 07/17/2017 11:47:22 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
What she (and all of them, really) did was suck all the oxygen out of the room with their obsession to "get Trump. " The other candidates didn't have a chance to break out on their own. She gave Trump the pulpit, and Trump bullied the others with it.

If Kelly, et. al., had been more even-handed with the candidates and let them freely engage with each other, who knows what might have come from it?

-PJ

88 posted on 07/17/2017 11:53:36 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

In trying to expose Trump’s character she exposed her own.


89 posted on 07/17/2017 11:55:52 AM PDT by kanawa (Trump Loves a Great Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“The media wanted Trump all the way. They did everything possible to negate the other 16 candidates.”

During the early primaries the news played Trump a lot. The dem stations mocked him while Fox and Rush talked about the promises he was making on the campaign trail. During the debates most of the other Republican contenders attacked him for his beliefs. Most of them took his candidacy for a joke and laughed. Bush said illegals came here as an act of love. Cruz called him a liar. Fox, Rush and Levin turned on him probably around September 2016 when he started doing well in the primaries.

—Anyway whoever your choice was I doubt they would have been able to take half the beating Trump did and still be president.


90 posted on 07/17/2017 11:58:04 AM PDT by Cats1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Cats1

Beating? Even the media that was supposedly “against”Trump presented the carefully curated image his campaign wanted to present, and blacked out anything else.


91 posted on 07/17/2017 12:00:06 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Cats1

I meant September 2015. Can’t believe it’s been 2 years since he announced.


92 posted on 07/17/2017 12:00:49 PM PDT by Cats1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“Even the media that was supposedly “against”Trump presented the carefully curated image his campaign wanted to present, and blacked out anything else.”

So when George Will said people voting for Trump were trash and when McCain called us Crazies, they were actually promoting Trump. When Rush would ask a pro Trump caller if they were actually a democrat, it was all fun and games. If that’s the case Antifa must really love him.


93 posted on 07/17/2017 12:09:40 PM PDT by Cats1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

bitch could come out nude for her show and I still wouldn’t watch.
Maybe if she were to get a face to face interview with JESUS I’d tune in. Other than that? NO


94 posted on 07/17/2017 12:12:31 PM PDT by Joe Boucher (President Trump makes obammy look like the punk he is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Trump picked up steam because his message resonated with us, the voters, who are sick of the GOPe as well as the Democrats. Her efforts made us angry and did not work, not because other candidates could not get traction, but because we FINALLY had a candidate who espoused our values AND told the media to stuff it AND had unlimited funds to keep going. We've had people we liked before, and they all could not gain traction because of the way the primaries are set up by the GOPe and because they were not as wealthy as Trump. His gains during the primaries over Jeb! and Little Marco and Lyin Ted and John Kasuck had nothing to do with MeAgain hurting those candidates, but had to do with us having the candidate that could stick it out and who FOUGHT!

The notion that all the negativeattention that Trump got is what caused him to win is BS, spouted by those who lost and usually those who were nevertrumpers. [whining voice] "If only my candidate had been examined, he could have won." Right. No one but Trump could have beat Hillary. None. Some didn't want to. Some would have fought hard but no one but Trump could have won PA, MI and WI. That's a fact. And he did it in spite of the massively negative news coverage, not because of it.

So, believe your fantasies and come back in 4 or 8 years with one of those losers and see what happens. They will still be losers.

95 posted on 07/17/2017 12:12:33 PM PDT by Defiant (The media is the colostomy bag where truth goes after democrats digest it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Since wearing negligees to work hasn’t helped Mee-Again, maybe she should go to work topless. There doesn’t appear to be much to look at, but curiosity could bump her ratings temporarily.

Or.......she could try a Mika the Adulterous Skank stunt and lay on her back with her legs in the air.....while she does her interviews. It didn’t work out that well for Mika, but hey, Ia’m just brainstorming here.


96 posted on 07/17/2017 12:16:22 PM PDT by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonno

Her career advisors would say that a new ratings low deserves a new neckline low, except there is no room to go lower.

97 posted on 07/17/2017 12:20:35 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

The answer is obvious. Nude pictorial in Playboy, followed by a brief career in soft-porn, then alcoholism.


98 posted on 07/17/2017 12:22:05 PM PDT by IamConservative (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kanawa
In trying to expose Trump’s character she exposed her own.


99 posted on 07/17/2017 12:38:34 PM PDT by Company Man (Begun, the meme wars have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The left always hated her, and still does. The right loved her, until she turned traitor. Now the right hates her too. Not a very good career strategy. Hope she salts that money away, because the next gig is doing infomercials for kitchen implements in the wee hours of Sunday morning. And I’m sure that doesn’t pay as well.


100 posted on 07/17/2017 12:47:18 PM PDT by henkster (Ask your favorite liberal to take the "Snowflake Challenge.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson