Posted on 07/17/2017 10:06:27 AM PDT by davikkm
Things are not going well for Megyn Kelly. The NBC hosts show Sunday Night with Megyn Kelly has sunk to a new ratings low.
Variety reports:
Earlier in the night at 7 p.m. on NBC, Sunday Night with Megyn Kelly drew a 0.4 rating and 3.1 million viewers, the newsmagazines lowest total viewer number since it debuted at the beginning of June. Kelly also matched a series low in the key demo.
For CBS, a new episode of Big Brother (1.8, 6 million) was even with last weeks Sunday airing. Candy Crush aired at 9 p.m., followed by a repeat of NCIS: Los Angeles.
NBC aired only repeats with the exception of Sunday Night with Megyn Kelly.
Kelly is reportedly panicking over her ratings slide, attempting to reach out to former colleagues for advice on how to reverse the trend.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
We will have to disagree about that. Do you believe in Russia collusion, in addition to Megyn collusion?
Coming soon to a street corner near you...
“Me Again” Kelly.
When a guy with the Super Ego of Bill O’Reilly can mock you with a nickname like that; you know you’ve gone too far.
The media wanted Trump all the way. They did everything possible to negate the other 16 candidates.
Perhaps you read only the first sentence of my comment, and not the next one: “They didn’t need to support him, they just needed not to be actively working against him, up to and including the election.” Yes, that’s how all news should be, factual and accurate.
But then, there are also opinion shows, like Hannity, O’Reilly, Tucker, and, formerly, MeAgain. Other than Hannity, who was supportive, and O’Reilly, who was coy and playing both sides, opinion shows on Fox, and their choice of guests and moderators, was something like 80 percent anti-trump. Their so-called Republicans, like Hume, Baier, Krautie, etc. were all virulent nevertrumpers. That didn’t have to be like that, and it would not have impacted the truthful reporting of the news to favor Trump or at least be 50/50 in the reporting.
Networks and newspapers have another way to show their bias, and it’s not just in the reporting of stories that may be factual. It is in their choice of what to report, and what not to report. So, for example, never reporting illegal alien crimes or inner city crime statistics or failure of their schools, or reporting on how bad the economy really is, or on the truth about Benghazi, these are all decisions that are made by the dozens ever day and which show an overwhelming bias against Trump and conservatives (real ones, not Faux ones like Bill Krystol and NR).
Where are you going to go to get the news reported and dumb opinion kept silent when what is reported is the reflection of a dumb opinion? Had Fox been fair to Trump on what it reported and how it reported it, as I said, that is all that we would ask. Instead, it was a barrage of anti-Trump stories and opinions, sent at us like cannon-shots.
What you ask for shows a lack of understanding about how the propaganda machine is running today.
Raise you hands if you are not surprised by this! Hand up! No way she was going to get ratings.
“I still love watching the video of the sick look on her face when it was announced on Fox News that Trump had won the election.”
Look on Megyn Kelly’s face when Trump won the election... PRICELESS
If Kelly, et. al., had been more even-handed with the candidates and let them freely engage with each other, who knows what might have come from it?
-PJ
In trying to expose Trump’s character she exposed her own.
“The media wanted Trump all the way. They did everything possible to negate the other 16 candidates.”
During the early primaries the news played Trump a lot. The dem stations mocked him while Fox and Rush talked about the promises he was making on the campaign trail. During the debates most of the other Republican contenders attacked him for his beliefs. Most of them took his candidacy for a joke and laughed. Bush said illegals came here as an act of love. Cruz called him a liar. Fox, Rush and Levin turned on him probably around September 2016 when he started doing well in the primaries.
—Anyway whoever your choice was I doubt they would have been able to take half the beating Trump did and still be president.
Beating? Even the media that was supposedly “against”Trump presented the carefully curated image his campaign wanted to present, and blacked out anything else.
I meant September 2015. Can’t believe it’s been 2 years since he announced.
“Even the media that was supposedly againstTrump presented the carefully curated image his campaign wanted to present, and blacked out anything else.”
So when George Will said people voting for Trump were trash and when McCain called us Crazies, they were actually promoting Trump. When Rush would ask a pro Trump caller if they were actually a democrat, it was all fun and games. If that’s the case Antifa must really love him.
bitch could come out nude for her show and I still wouldn’t watch.
Maybe if she were to get a face to face interview with JESUS I’d tune in. Other than that? NO
The notion that all the negativeattention that Trump got is what caused him to win is BS, spouted by those who lost and usually those who were nevertrumpers. [whining voice] "If only my candidate had been examined, he could have won." Right. No one but Trump could have beat Hillary. None. Some didn't want to. Some would have fought hard but no one but Trump could have won PA, MI and WI. That's a fact. And he did it in spite of the massively negative news coverage, not because of it.
So, believe your fantasies and come back in 4 or 8 years with one of those losers and see what happens. They will still be losers.
Since wearing negligees to work hasn’t helped Mee-Again, maybe she should go to work topless. There doesn’t appear to be much to look at, but curiosity could bump her ratings temporarily.
Or.......she could try a Mika the Adulterous Skank stunt and lay on her back with her legs in the air.....while she does her interviews. It didn’t work out that well for Mika, but hey, Ia’m just brainstorming here.
Her career advisors would say that a new ratings low deserves a new neckline low, except there is no room to go lower.
The answer is obvious. Nude pictorial in Playboy, followed by a brief career in soft-porn, then alcoholism.
The left always hated her, and still does. The right loved her, until she turned traitor. Now the right hates her too. Not a very good career strategy. Hope she salts that money away, because the next gig is doing infomercials for kitchen implements in the wee hours of Sunday morning. And I’m sure that doesn’t pay as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.