Posted on 07/17/2017 10:28:24 AM PDT by detective
We will see. If you have a legislative body opening its meetings with a Christian prayer given by one elected official in turn then where is that different from a judge installing a version of the 10 Commandments unique to some Christian sects and not to others? It's the government putting its stamp of approval on a particular religion. The Supreme Court ruled one practice was wrong, it may well rule the other wrong too. Or not hear the matter at all.
This decision by the King’s Royal Court would have the Founding Fathers running for their muskets.
7 of 17 active judges appointed by Zero. 4 appointed by the Great Stainmaker. So 11 out of 17 almost guarantees wrong and/or anti-American decisions in every case.
Eff these black robed tyrants. Pray anyway.
Dare them to do something about it.
L
You mean the Mare of Steel from the movie The Long Ships, methinks...
Sidney Poitier prepares to send Richard Widmark riding the Mare of Steel
Why is there a pad of steel spikes at the bottom of that thing? Talk about overkill. Do those crazy Muslims know how to have fun, or what?
“A chaplain or guest minister is not an elected official”
Elected officials in the U.S. House and Senate have delivered prayers and invocations many times. I am sure it is the same with state and local officials.
A judge has no legitimate authority to tell an American that he can not pray. This is just one more example of Federal Courts exceeding their authority, violating the principles of the Constitution and violating the rights of American citizens in to promote their leftist, anti-religion agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.