Posted on 07/21/2017 9:29:52 AM PDT by ColdOne
In a seeming act of defiance toward the Trump administration, a federal judge in San Francisco has refused to reinstate the president’s sanctuary cities order.
The bold move to not reinstate President Donald Trump's executive order -- which sought to slash funding to cities that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities -- comes amid a battle between the State Department and local governments across the country over the edict from Washington.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
States rights don’t include ignoring federal law.
The bold move to not reinstate President Donald Trump’s executive order — which sought to slash funding to cities that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities
Treason is bold ?
Speaking of IMPEACHMENT
Possibly. States rights don’t include ignoring the constitution, I would agree. States are supposed to have some right of self determination. But if a state may ignore fed law with regard to sanctuary city status and marijuana may we not also ignore federal gun laws and income tax laws? It does open up some interesting possibility, if taken to logical conclusion.
Reminder - an executive order is not federal law
Need to have the House and Senate pass a law making it a felony to enter the country illegally... so we can prosecute those who ‘aid and abet’
8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(1)(A)(iii) Any person who knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation; shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B)
8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(1)(B)(ii) A person who violates subparagraph (A) shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
5 years per violation.
Nothing will change until we LOCK ‘EM UP.
Apparently this judge doesn't like the way President Trump talks, and that is sufficient.
Do we need a constitutional amendment? How can we stop a rogue judiciary, where the honest rule of law is the exception. This is truly the elephant in the room that no one dare talk about other than complain. Myself, I have no idea how to fix it, so I rank with one of the complainers.
We’re in banana republic territory now.
“edict from Washington.”
Nice that he press is catching on. For the last 8 years they acted like Obama’s executive orders were rule of law, er, more like must obey commandments from High.
Arrest him and charge him with the federal crime of harboring aliens, 8 USC Section 1324. These revolutionaries need to be brought to heel.
Since the rogue judiciary is not following the Constitution and rule of law the administration can enforce the law regardless of their rogue opinions. Then let them take whatever action they can. We shall see who has authority when it comes to illegal immigration.
Absolutely correct but in this case it has the same weight.
Immigration enforcement could set up a big shop right across the street from this so called judge. See if he like those apples.
Throw one of these morons in jail.
Note the SF-Hawaii connection.
Eric Holder is hiding out in SF busy running the Obama Machine.
Who signs the checks?
Impeach the rogue jurist.
Trump and Pence may as well call Bekins..
Time to move out..
WE now have a rotating federal judiciary now acting as our President... and a media happy to report how much happier everyone is, as a result. :-)
Its just a matter of time... poop .. fan .. Breaking Nooz .. cnn
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.