Love Don Martin.
You pro-choice?
Posted on 07/22/2017 12:41:29 PM PDT by AbolishCSEU
Excuse me? This guy posted the “boo hoo” girl about this man’s complete misfortune. I was basically saying, perhaps he would get the “boo hoo” girl when some extremely unfair thing happens him.
Well maybe you will get into a raw deal that wasn’t of your creation, and you will get the boo-hoo girl. Don’t hurt yourself patting yourself on the back by how much more responsible you think you are than everyone else.
“Well maybe you will get into a raw deal that wasn’t of your creation”
Not analogous.
This raw deal was 100% due to his actions and decisions - ie of his creation.
Lesson: don’t have sex with women who aren’t your wife.
Not hard to understand.
Okay Mr. Perfect. Like I said, I hope you get put on the hook for something you didn’t do.
you, sir, have obviously never had to deal with “family” court.... your ignorance of the subject is obvious for all to see....... GWB is a liberal.. I however, am not even close to that...... go to DU, your posts will be appreciated there..
You are incorrect. After paying massive amounts of CS, few men have the means to go to court to constantly fight for the basic rights that they are supposedly allowed. Research dr. Craig Childress and parental alienation
“you, sir, have obviously never had to deal with “family” court.... “
That’s right.
Why not?
Because I have sex with the woman I married and love and stay with her and take care of our children with her.
Why do you think endorsing biblical sexual mores is not conservative? You make no sense.
This fellow would not have had this happen if he had practiced traditional religious values rather than the new values of the left.
I sense that you have never gone through so-called family court as a Caucasian Western male. Most women are given custody no matter what and they almost immediately start to withhold visitation especially if the man dares to move on.
The man then must hire expensive attorneys just to enforce his basic visitation rights. The judges, who are usually anti father, will just give a slap on the wrist to the custodial mom if any for essentially breaking the law by withholding visitation. The judge is most likely to simply order “counseling” usually done by an anti father psychiatrist.
Love Don Martin.
You pro-choice?
Your view is utopian at best. You do know that your wife, if she desires to drop you like a hot potato, can divorce you and take everything you have. if you have any school-age children, she can take them as well. She can deny you visitation with impudence and move hundreds of miles away from you with virtually no consequence.
Your view is utopian at best. You do know that your wife, if she desires to drop you like a hot potato, can divorce you and take everything you have. if you have any school-age children, she can take them as well. She can deny you visitation with impudence and move hundreds of miles away from you with virtually no consequence.
“Biblical” sex and the family court are two different things.... in this case the man was committed to the woman and SHE is the one who choose to go elsewhere for her pleasure.. not him... yet you take the side of the fornicator over the one that wanted things to work out.... are you really Dr. Phil, the man hating man, acting as a troll???
“Your view is utopian at best.”
How is what was the norm in this country for centuries until the hippies destroyed everything utopian?
I’ll take utopia then.
“You do know that your wife, if she desires to drop you like a hot potato, can divorce you and take everything you have. if you have any school-age children, she can take them as well. She can deny you visitation with impudence and move hundreds of miles away from you with virtually no consequence.”
If that were to happen I would have failed.
“You do know that your wife, if she desires to drop you like a hot potato, can divorce you and take everything you have. if you have any school-age children, she can take them as well. She can deny you visitation with impudence and move hundreds of miles away from you with virtually no consequence.”
PS.
the above has nothing to do with this case in question.
““Biblical” sex and the family court are two different things...”
Very much so.
As far as the secular legal case, he could have contested paternity, and won, 15 years ago.
He didn’t. That’s the crux of it. He messed up.
“. in this case the man was committed to the woman and SHE is the one who choose to go elsewhere for her pleasure.. not him... yet you take the side of the fornicator over the one that wanted things to work out”
This makes no sense. No information regarding any of this other than both were “fornicators” not just one.
Facts of the matter are he was having sex with a woman he was not married to. She became pregnant. He was named father and assessed child support. He did not contest and allowed wage garnishment. 15 years later he contested paternity and was shown not to be the father. He owes no more child support, only owes what he agreed to previously.
If he had contested in the first place it would have been settled a decade and a half ago.
He didn’t. He messed up.
That is the secular legal basis for this.
“are you really Dr. Phil, the man hating man, acting as a troll???”
The fact you watch such garbage and such is an immediate reference for explains a lot with regard to your moral confusion.
Well okay.
Tell us what the Bible says about fraudulent support orders.
We'll wait...
Millions of abortions have something to do with that too, not to mention that about 40% of children are born out of wedlock.
Women are forcing it on men
Since when do women force men to have sex with them? Since when do they have to?
and too many men in positions of power are acquiescing - that's been the case for decades.
Cross out the "in positions of power", and I'll agree. Men in their penis dictated servitude have capitulated across the board.
You didn't answer my point about prostitution. Explain how men have billions to spend on prostitutes but can't send a fraction of that to support the MRAs who are trying to fight this.
You have a twisted view.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.