Posted on 08/08/2017 5:48:59 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Thirty minutes. Thats about how long it would take a nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) launched from North Korea to reach Los Angeles. With the powers in Pyongyang working doggedly toward making this possiblebuilding an ICBM and shrinking a nuke to fit on itanalysts now predict that Kim Jong Un will have the capability before Donald Trump completes one four-year term.
About which the president has tweeted, simply, It wont happen!
Though given to reckless oaths, Trump is not in this case saying anything that departs significantly from the past half century of futile American policy toward North Korea. Preventing the Kim dynasty from having a nuclear device was an American priority long before Pyongyang exploded its first nuke, in 2006, during the administration of George W. Bush. The Kim regime detonated four more while Barack Obama was in the White House. In the more than four decades since Richard Nixon held office, the U.S. has tried to control North Korea by issuing threats, conducting military exercises, ratcheting up diplomatic sanctions, leaning on China, and most recently, it seems likely, committing cybersabotage.
For his part, Trump has also tweeted that North Korea is looking for trouble and that he intends to solve the problem. His administration has leaked plans for a decapitation strike that would target Kim, which seems like the very last thing a country ought to announce in advance.
None of which, we should all pray, will amount to much. Ignorant of the long history of the problem, Trump at least brings fresh eyes to it. But he is going to collide with the same harsh truth that has stymied all his recent predecessors: There are no good options for dealing with North Korea. Meanwhile, he is enthusiastically if unwittingly playing the role assigned to him by the comic-book-style foundation myth of the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea. From Our July/August 2017 Issue
Try 2 FREE issues of The Atlantic Subscribe
The myth holds that Korea and the Kim dynasty are one and the same. It is built almost entirely on the promise of standing up to a powerful and menacing foreign enemy. The more looming the threatand Trump excels at loomingthe better the narrative works for Kim Jong Un. Nukes are needed to repel this threat. They are the linchpin of North Koreas defensive strategy, the single weapon standing between barbarian hordes and the glorious destiny of the Korean peopleall of them, North and South. Kim is the great leader, heir to divinely inspired ancestors who descended from Mount Paektu with mystical, magical powers of leadership, vision, diplomatic savvy, and military genius. Like his father, Kim Jong Il, and grandfather Kim Il Sung before him, Kim is the anointed defender of all Koreans, who are the purest of all races. Even South Korea, the Republic of Korea, should be thankful for Kim because, if not for him, the United States would have invaded long ago. Even failed tests move North Korea closer to its goalpossessing nuclear weapons capable of hitting U.S. cities.
This racist mythology and belief in the supernatural status of the Mount Paektu bloodline defines North Korea, and illustrates how unlikely it is that diplomatic pressure will ever persuade the present Dear Leader to back down. Right now the best hope for keeping the country from becoming an operational nuclear power rests, as it long has, with China, which may or may not have enough economic leverage to influence Kims policy makingand which also may not particularly want to do so, since having a friendly neighbor making trouble for Washington and Seoul serves Beijings interests nicely at times.
American sabotage has likely played a role in Pyongyangs string of failed missile launches in recent years. According to David E. Sanger and William J. Broad of The New York Times, as the U.S. continued its covert cyberprogram last year, 88 percent of North Koreas flight tests of its intermediate-range Musudan missiles ended in failure. Given that these missiles typically exploded, sometimes scattering in pieces into the sea, determining the precise causeparticularly for experts outside North Koreais impossible. Failure is a big part of missile development, and missiles can blow up on their own for plenty of reasons, but the percentage of failures certainly suggests sabotage. The normal failure rate for developmental missile tests, according to The Times, is about 5 to 10 percent. Its also possible that the sabotage program is not computer-related; it might, for instance, involve more old-fashioned techniques such as feeding faulty parts into the missiles supply chain. If sabotage of any kind is behind the failures, however, no one expects it to do more than slow progress. Even failed tests move Pyongyang closer to its announced goal: possessing nuclear weapons capable of hitting U.S. cities. Related Story
Mapping the Threat of North Korea
Kims regime may be evil and deluded, but its not stupid. It has made sure that the whole world knows its aims, and it has carried out public demonstrations of its progress, which double as a thumb in the eye of the U.S. and South Korea. The regime has also moved its medium-range No-dong and Scud missiles out of testing and into active service, putting on displays that show their reachwhich now extends to South Korean port cities and military sites, as well as to the U.S. Marine Corps Air Station in Iwakuni, Japan. In mid-May, the regime successfully fired a missile that traveled, in a high arc, farther than one ever had before: 1,300 miles, into the Sea of Japan. Missile experts say it could have traveled 3,000 miles, well past American forces stationed in Guam, if the trajectory had been lower. Jeffrey Lewis, an arms-control expert at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, wrote in Foreign Policy in March:
North Koreas military exercises leave little doubt that Pyongyang plans to use large numbers of nuclear weapons against U.S. forces throughout Japan and South Korea to blunt an invasion. In fact, the word that official North Korean statements use is repel. North Korean defectors have claimed that the countrys leaders hope that by inflicting mass casualties and destruction in the early days of a conflict, they can force the United States and South Korea to recoil from their invasion.
This isnt new. This threat has been present for more than 20 years. It is widely known inside North Korea that [the nation] has produced, deployed, and stockpiled two or three nuclear warheads and toxic material, such as over 5,000 tons of toxic gases, Choi Ju-hwal, a North Korean colonel who defected, told a U.S. Senate subcommittee in 1997. By having these weapons, the North is able to prevent itself from being slighted by such major powers as the United States, Russia, China, and Japan, and also they are able to gain the upper hand in political negotiations and talks with those superpowers.
For years North Korea has had extensive batteries of conventional artilleryan estimated 8,000 big gunsjust north of the demilitarized zone (DMZ), which is less than 40 miles from Seoul, South Koreas capital, a metropolitan area of more than 25 million people. One high-ranking U.S. military officer who commanded forces in the Korean theater, now retired, told me hed heard estimates that if a grid were laid across Seoul dividing it into three-square-foot blocks, these guns could, within hours, pepper every single one. This ability to rain ruin on the city is a potent existential threat to South Koreas largest population center, its government, and its economic anchor. Shells could also deliver chemical and biological weapons. Adding nuclear ICBMs to this arsenal would put many more cities in the same position as Seoul. Nuclear-tipped ICBMs, according to Lewis, are the final piece of a defensive strategy to keep Trump from doing anything regrettable after Kim Jong Un obliterates Seoul and Tokyo.
How should the United States proceed?
What to do about North Korea has been an intractable problem for decades. Although shooting stopped in 1953, Pyongyang insists that the Korean War never ended. It maintains as an official policy goal the reunification of the Korean peninsula under the Kim dynasty.
As tensions flared in recent months, fanned by bluster from both Washington and Pyongyang, I talked with a number of national-security experts and military officers who have wrestled with the problem for years, and who have held responsibility to plan and prepare for real conflict. Among those I spoke with were former officials from the White House, the National Security Council, and the Pentagon; military officers who have commanded forces in the region; and academic experts.
From these conversations, I learned that the U.S. has four broad strategic options for dealing with North Korea and its burgeoning nuclear program.
1. Prevention: A crushing U.S. military strike to eliminate Pyongyangs arsenals of mass destruction, take out its leadership, and destroy its military. It would end North Koreas standoff with the United States and South Korea, as well as the Kim dynasty, once and for all.
2. Turning the screws: A limited conventional military attackor more likely a continuing series of such attacksusing aerial and naval assets, and possibly including narrowly targeted Special Forces operations. These would have to be punishing enough to significantly damage North Koreas capabilitybut small enough to avoid being perceived as the beginning of a preventive strike. The goal would be to leave Kim Jong Un in power, but force him to abandon his pursuit of nuclear ICBMs.
(rest at link)
How about No More Free Republic for starters? Sheesh!
Yes, and adios to Donald Jr. and Eric and their lovely families.
Think....
GFY GJMY. That crap is not appreciated one bit by all the fine California FReepers. We are by far the biggest state contingent on FR.
It is so predictable...Just like junior high schoolers...
So its a no lose situation for Trump.
There are conservative Trump loving patriots in every city.
“I’m not saying we wouldn’t get our hair mussed...”
Next time I’ll add the “/s” to make it clear.
Obviously I”m not rooting for half the world to be blown up.
That’d be bad for the economy. Oh, and all the dead people.
OH I did not say you were rooting for half the world to be blown up...Worst case scenario a bunch of Obama-voting cities get blown up here. So its a no lose situation for Trump.
Not just you, and I think some of us would appreciate the /S.
The upsetting part:
That many around here—joking or not so much, seem to feel it is perfectly fine if certain states or cities get nuked because they voted blue. That seem like something an elitist globalist would say, not a conservative Freeper.
Those of us who live in proximity to such cities really find those comments not funny...not at all.
Priorities...dead people, and maybe then the economy?
I would just encourage people to think before posting this stuff.
I agree that the constant barrage by immature idiots on good people living in liberal states is junior high school slime. What sane person wishes a nuke on any part of the US? The “jest” was never funny and is thoroughly worn out. People living in the mentioned / targeted states do not appreciate or want that ridiculous imbecility here on FR.
Agreed.
Irony is that these Freepers don’t seem to realize that Free Republic is located in NorCal—not that far from the Bay area...
California is beautiful—I have family in Bay area, Pacific Grove area, Oceanside, San Diego, and LaJolla. They are all conservative or libertarian. Would no more vote for Hillary than I would. Many of them were there long before the libs!
“Start evacuating Seoul.”
Families of GI’s first. That will send a clear message.
Hey, I’ve been on those trains between Inchon and Seoul. I think they squeeze about a million people on a train.
They already have the bomb and so does Iran
Thats why you beat them and take all that money back. They will pay trillions for peace with US. or.....they will pay trillions for not having peace with US.
Otherwise they win through a cheap proxy bluff.
They could smuggle these in over our open border or just keep them in international waters or Mexico for that matter. Hell we launched an ICBM from an airtransport during the Nixon years. And this is Chinese supplied weaponry....who are we kidding that the Norks could produce all this stuff by themselves. The Chinese are make Trump sweat....its time Trump makes them bleed.
Sure, if China gets into the act it could make things more interesting. But even little nukes are comprised of things that will ping back to a particular kind of scanning ray.
Kim is getting dangerous because he’s actually believing his own buffalo. What happens when he gets a notion to nuke Beijing?
It will be fascinating if Trump - who ran on limiting our foreign interventions - got us into a hot war with China and North Korea in the first year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.