Posted on 08/21/2017 2:24:01 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
How much Soros money has been funneled to her?
But let me guess, someone like Ginsberg could run over a child and this woman probably would not raise any eyebrows, eh?
Talk to me about the “wise Latina” and those Supreme Court justices who performed homosexual weddings but did not recuse themselves...
Winning has turned in won on this front.
What a pile of fetid manure. Big surprise, a lib woman writes of her moral superiority in a liberal newspaper.
Still can’t figure out how a bunch of draft dodging baby killing looting mooching drunken druggie purveyors of perversion, crime and lies became the moral conscience of America.
Will they ever stop with the absurdities?
Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg.
The lamentations of the Left are just a delight to watch and hear. It’s a wonderful — and entertaining — thing to behold!
Neil Gorsuch doesn’t seem to care much about impartiality after all
Washington Post ^ | August 21, 2017 | By Elizabeth Wydra
I never got my hopes up on these things any more... there is too much money to bribe and none are exempt from accepting it. The left has a goal and a lot of money!
It’s a hotel.
It has Trump’s name on it.
Some Conservative group has leased their ballroom.
Gorsuch accepted an invitation to speak there.
Trump personally benefits in NO WAY.
Are they REALLY this slow on the uptake?
...but more than Kagan, Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor.
There, I fixed it.
Contrast that with nominees by Clinton and Obama (Ginsberg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagen) and find ONE of them who isn't 100% predictable in every single case of any significance. I challenge you. Totally reliable left wing votes, every time.
See Ginsburg, Sotomayor
“The Trump International Hotel has become a prominent symbol, in the heart of our nation’s capital, of Trump’s success at exploiting his elective office for personal gain.”
That is patent nonsense. It was a success long before Trump ever announced his run for the presidency, and his companies, all of them collectively don’t need his presidency for their continued success.
Also, I am sure, Trump does not personally see anyone using, or not using his hotel in D.C. as a point to favor or disfavor them. Mere “appearances” are often not reality, and “conflict of interest” matters should, within the law, require bonafide tit-for-tat actions that are in evidence.
It would be unbelievable to me think Trump would ask “where did Gorsuch make that speech; at my hotel I hope”, or just as unbelievable for Gorsuch to say “Trump will see I am with him if I do this speech at his hotel”. The writer thinks their fantasies amount to a conflict of interest.
It’s not that they’re slow on the uptake, it’s that they’re propagandists.
The POTUS does not even take a salary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.