Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tammy8

Was the written agreement in the event the hospital/nurses/doctors were doing the blood draw or ? The detective was going to do his own blood draw in this case. How does the hospital handle this (i.e. “exigent circumstances”):
http://www.utahduilegal.com/warrantless-blood-draws/

Related:
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/supreme_court_says_warrantless_blood_tests_incident_to_drunken_driving_arre/

We need more info. on the case...I am sure a jury will be hearing it all!


52 posted on 09/01/2017 10:48:15 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Drago

There won’t be a jury because the city’s liability insurance carrier will be negotiating a settlement. There is no way in hell they are going to allow that video to be played to jury.

The unconscious guy is not the perp, the perp is dead so there are no exigent circumstances.


59 posted on 09/01/2017 10:56:31 PM PDT by Valpal1 (I am grown weary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Drago

It is my understanding the laws about blood draws apply to the driver not the medical professionals. The agreement only allowed for the conditions listed. I think there are a lot of legal issues here for lawyers to quibble over. The nurse followed hospital policy and laws concerning patient care and rights.


64 posted on 09/01/2017 11:12:21 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Drago

This case gets settled, it will never see a jury.


84 posted on 09/02/2017 2:04:39 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson