Posted on 10/18/2017 12:43:45 PM PDT by detective
Former United Nations ambassador Samantha Power is denying, emphatically, to Congress, that she ever requested 260 unmaskings of Americans caught up in intelligence surveillance dragnets during President Obama's last year in office. She says someone else did it.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
These unmaskings were illegal and an abuse of power by the Obama administration.
SHE LIES LIKE HER BOSS OBAMA
(oops there goes the caps lock)
I am betting if she in fact didn’t it was either Ben the Snake Rhoads or V. J.
What is the process used for an unmasking request? For security purposes, one would think there would be something in place to ensure a request could not easily be made with stolen credentials (for example, when the request is received, notification would be sent back directly to the individual making the request).
This sounds like a conspiracy theory. Didn’t her husband Cass Sunstein want to make conspiracy theories illegal?
She used to scream, “GENOCIDE!!! GENOCIDE!!! GENOCIDE!!!”
I cannot remember cases of GENOCIDE that were as bad as happened under obama and Samantha Power. Christians were being slaughtered, Samantha and obama just looked the other way. They are EVIL to the core.
This doesn't pass the laugh test. If someone stole her name and password to make unmasking requests, it stands to reason that the intel community would send the responses to Powers, not the "phantom requester." Wouldn't she see the responses and raise questions about it? This is total BS.
[I cannot remember cases of GENOCIDE that were as bad as happened under obama and Samantha Power. Christians were being slaughtered, Samantha and obama just looked the other way. They are EVIL to the core.]
Samanta Power championed using United Nations troops to enforce a “two-state solution” on Israel.
IOW, she wanted to use the United Nations to do what is marked for the 70th week prophesied in the Book of Daniel. I think we all know what Obama would have done; he would have gone with it, no problem.
Let that one sink in.
But they can take heart; it’s gonna happen. Some day.
I’m not saying that’s a good thing; only that it is prophesied.
If only more in the world understood that a “two-state solution” is bad. Very bad. Way beyond bad.
Easily to walk them backwards and find out. The request comes from one method of delivery and there is one method of receiving. There can’t be anything in between.
If it came from Powers computer or signed or unsigned memorandum then it’s up to here to prove she didn’t write them.
My thoughts, if she said she didn’t then she probably didn’t and the DOJ does not want to look in further.
Years ago my brothers dog ate his pay check ,LOL, I think he found some in the yard the next day
She is schizo. Her other self did the unmaskings. She is not responsible for what her O.S. does and did.
Hitlery Clinton Syndrome: A patern of addle pated Prevarications intended to redirect responsibility of misdeeds onto anyone or anything other than the person truly responsible. See the tome “What Happened”.
Or LL
Well that's a no-brainer.
If they're not going to pass Trump's agenda, and they're not going to do their own oversight responsibility with results and consequences for the lawbreakers, then they shouldn't run for office.
The time for people to go to jail is past due.
Let’s see whose fingerprints are on the documents?
Would guess VJ as she has the documented “don’t get mad, get even” streak. Blame it on another person thinking the race card will protect them and no one will peel back the onion enough to find out who really did the unmasking?
I thought I heard some one say the the UN ambassador doesn’t have the authority to request unmasking. Something to do with national security or law enforcement need to know.
those who live by the bus, must be prepared to die under the bus.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.