Doubling down on stupid.
NPR ?
If NPR has a copy, why is it not online?
The leaker(s) in jail?
“... authoritative assessment of climate science...”
Pruitt has said that the EPA’s science should not be political science.
SMDH! For crap sake. Didn’t these asssclowns have free tickets to see “Geo Storm” so they could get some ideas on how to build the wever controlling space station? So, here we are yet again. Answer these. Even though they may fall outside the last 115 years. Which is a fart in the wind in the age of muver erf.
1. Define the correct temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the correct humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the correct mean sea level for the planet.
4. Define the correct amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the correct makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the correct amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
Otherwise, STFU!
Nothing screams truth like the phrase “Massive Government Report.”
“The climate report, obtained by NPR, notes that the past 115 years are “the warmest in the history of modern civilization.” The global average temperature has increased by about 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit over that period ( +/- 15 degrees margin of error). “
If it was just a 450-page report, it would be easy to blow off, but gosh, 600 pages? That’s pretty impressive.
They should call them to testify and watch them say we don’t know that over and over again, but we just know it’s true.
U.S. Government researchers, m-m-m-m, yes...
From NPR. Who knew? When these reports say ‘man caused’ it’s code for ‘Republican caused’.
There was very little increase in C02 levels before 1950.
So the first 50 years of warming occurred before the increases in C02.
Which is closing the ozone hole which is a good thing?
"This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model, for the first time in human history.
"This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the industrial revolution. That will not happen overnight and it will not happen at a single conference on climate change, be it COP 15, 21, 40 - you choose the number. It just does not occur like that. It is a process, because of the depth of the transformation."
--Christiane Fugueres, Executive Secretary of UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change)
> “dominant cause”
A few years ago they tried to find a way to use words like “majority” and “most” when the numbers were less than half.
* majority of warming is caused by humans
* most scientists believe ...
“dominant” works for them because general population will think it’s HUGE and they don’t need to argue with skeptics how “dominant” can be less than half. (even under 5% can be “dominant”)
Delingpole: Now 400 Scientific Papers in 2017 Say Global Warming Is a Myth
breitbart.com ^ | 10/24/2017 | James Delingpole
Posted on 10/24/2017, 7:09:40 AM by rktman
When I reported earlier this year on the 58 scientific papers published in 2017 that say global warming is a myth the greenies heads exploded.
Since then, that figure has risen to 400 scientific papers.
Can you imagine the misery and consternation and horror this is going to cause in the corrupt, rancid, rent-seeking world of the Climate Industrial Complex?
I can. It will look something like this.
Just to be clear, so the greenies cant bleat about being misrepresented, here is what these various papers say:
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Prof. Pianka (UT Austin), please pick up the white courteously phone.
He wants 90% of mankind wiped out with Ebola.
Total BS, when will these FOOLS stop this nonsense.