Shrimp Smith is a skunk in the Fox News chicken house!!!
Can’t stand that guy.
Shep is probably a “chicken hawk.”
Like Shep knows anything about skunks or chickens.
It is rather fishy.
Every time Shemp opens his mouth, all I hear is a queef.
Details about Rene Boucher, the man who assaulted Rand Paul, reveal possible motive
The real story wont come out for quite a while. Obviously, everybody involved has been told to shut up and not talk to press.
Really...who gives a rats ass?
skunk in the chicken house?????? doesn’t even make sense
Fox in the hen house or skunk in the outhouse . . . maybe
Hard to fake five broken ribs . . . of course Shep is an expert on embellished fakery
Well the whole thing does seem kind of strange..the attacker is out on what, a 7500 bond for ATTACKING a sitting Senator..they have been neighbors for 17 years now so the douche bag that attacked Paul knew he was a Republican its not like for 17 years he had no clue so why attack him now
Nothing more than a guess but I’ll bet Rand Paul himself wanted to downplay this to protect his idiot neighbor from the national media circus. Just my gut feeling that he’s not a vindictive guy and he is well aware of the insanity of the press.
So what is Shep implying? That the assault was much worse than reported? That it’s Senator Paul’s fault? That Paul deserved it? I’m baffled.
The real skunk in the hen house is the chief Hen himself.
This is one of the rare times I’ll take his side. He was commenting about the lack of anybody yet ascribing a motive for the assault. Right now the defense is desperately trying to say there was no political motive because that would move the whole thing up from simple aggravated assault to potential terrorism.
He’s coming up with the same whacked-out metaphors that goofed up Dan Rather’s career. Are all drive-bys nuts??
I guess he’s taken over the ‘goofy’ idioms department from Dan Rather...................
What does that even mean?
Legally, the “motivation” for the unprovoked blindside assault is irrelevant. Doesn’t matter if the attacker hates republicans or short people. The assault is what matters.
This is so damn ridiculous. It is assault with intent to do bodily harm.
Where in the world did we arrive at the distorted reasoning/conclusion that “intention” changes the nature of the crime??
I want to know why a US Senator is mowing his own lawn. Aren’t there some illegals in his town to do that?