Posted on 11/14/2017 9:54:35 AM PST by SeekAndFind
AMERICA PRAYER VIGIL
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3604518/posts
Not for nothing, but I do believe it is possible to get phone records that far back.
The real question is not about who should be crucified in the court of public opinion.
The real question is who has repented. All have sinned. Nobody in the Senate or in the media has the glory belonging to God.
If Judge Roy Moore or anyone else as much as looked at a woman with lust forty years ago, they sinned according to what God tells us.
Anyone who has repented in their heart and trusts in The Lord Jesus is innocent of past wrongdoings.
Swamp creatures are revealing themselves by the dozens in their response to Roy Moore’s situation. It always amazes me that the most abundant substance in Washington is fake moral outrage on the part of the transparently depraved residents of the swamp. Trump made a comment about the swamp a few months ago which is being illustrated now - “the swamp is really a sewer”.
We’re back to the allegations are enough to convict. But Judge Moore needs to fight back, we can’t save him if he won’t save himself.
This statement here is pure BS, and outs Shaprio as a faux-servative fraud!
Per the FBI, there was PROOF of Hillary’s maleficence, but Comey didn’t have the balls to do anything about it.
There is ZERO proof against Moore... only speculation and well choreographed smears and lies.
[The first argument: Moore hasn’t been convicted of anything, and due process requires us to consider him innocent until proven guilty. This argument is empty, because our decision to vote for or against a particular candidate doesn’t require due process — Hillary Clinton wasn’t convicted of anything, either, except in the minds of the public. Due process determines whether you go to jail. The public determines whether it thinks politicians ought to be handed power.]
Even though the molestation and jail-bait claims are probably bogus, the left did succeed in bringing out the fact that Moore apparently dated teenagers when he was in his thirties. There was nothing illegal about it, but is adds an "eeeeew factor" to his candidacy that is likely to stick.
Until Bannon and conservatives start playing as dirty as McConnell,
this is what u end up with.
As to “...we know he signed her yearbook....”, I have seen a thread or two this morning, which seem to indicate that he did not sign her yearbook.
I think this “fact” has yet to be proven, which could take apart the entire story of that accuser.
This author is a lost ball in high weeds. Everything he says is a$$ backwards. Anyone can accuse anyone of anything. According to him every candidate should drop out if anyone accuses them of anything ... because they may be guilty.
The burden of proof is on the accusers and not Roy Moore.
Did Doug Jones molest a 13 year old soccer girl?
Did Mitch McConnell molest a 14 year old babysitter?
The people want answers, not denials.
Not for extension phones (as we used to call them.)
RE: There is ZERO proof against Moore... only speculation and well choreographed smears and lies.
I would really like to give Moore the benefit of the doubt.
But his response to Hannity’s questions were anything but assuring...
Just read this:
“I’m not going to dispute anything, but I don’t remember anything like that”
Why not just say — I DISPUTE IT. IT DID NOT HAPPEN. PERIOD.
And here is the giveaway — he said he “didn’t “generally” date teenagers when he was in his 30s,”
To me, that means he did. If the girls were 17 and the age of consent in Alabama is 16, then there’s nothing illegal in what he did. The only question then is — did anything untoward happen during the “date”.
The mother said she did NOT have a phone in her bedroom.
A question Shapiro fails to include is....”Do we know the swamp is capable of launching a fake character assassination exercise?”
For me, the answer is YES. Examine the motives and you will find your answer.
The best answer is to leave this to the voters of Alabama who know Judge Moore the best.
To repent, you have to first confess. Moore hasn’t done this.
Yet you have a point that Moore has led a legally blameless life for 35 years, with no hint of impropriety.
“perhaps they’ll make an objective judgment about the allegations against Moore and remind themselves that character still matters in life and even in politics. “
This is the reason to vote FOR Moore.
After spending hundreds of thousands of dollars examining his life the worse credible claim his enemies can find is that he flirted with young, but legal, women.
There is nearly an infinite number of mistakes a person can make in their life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.