Posted on 11/25/2017 11:19:51 PM PST by DeweyCA
In fact, the arguments are easily done away with, but it means being politically incorrect to a great extreme.
I have easily sorted out huge numbers of SJWs across the web by simply beginning every conversation by attacking the “myth of black victimization,” with a strong focus on black crime, and how it compares to Hispanic crime, Asian crime, etc etc., and also the extreme levels of black on white crime, and how all of this is out of proportion with their population numbers by an extreme degree. Emphasis should be made on explicit examples, such as grannies getting gang raped by gangs, or people being burned alive. These are objective facts which they can’t deny.
In their attempts to explain them, the SJW can take you for a wild ride. I had one a few weeks ago essentially make the point that the reason why blacks have such an extreme crime rate, score low on school tests, and in general are utterly dysfunctional, but Hispanics and other non-whites are not, despite all living in an oppressive anti-minority system, is because they’ve been oppressed so badly since the days of slavery that dysfunction is practically transmitted in the genes!
The real key to defeating them is basically moving to a point psychologically where you don’t care how they freak out or call you racist. You ignore the statements and obscene, even violent behavior, and when you force them to deal with the facts outside of their abstract theories, you win the argument and gain support from normal people.
I always point out that black community health measurements, as measured by the government, were nearly on par with whites until about 1960. I also point out that the freed slaves and their children built vibrant communities and institutions, largely by their own hand.
the goal is dominance and exclusion.
1. Demand for dominance/compliance (because of lack of safety/perceived threat). 2. Dominance exercised through the exclusion of perceived threat. 3. Non-compliance/questions trigger accusations, i.e. racism, sexism, etc. (the booby-trap). 4. Accusations become proof of lack of safety/threat. 5. Return to step 1 and repeat.
This is the core of the SJW movement.
This “social justice” mentality is much more widespread than people outside of the academy realize. They are coming closer to complete censorship. Their totalitarian authoritarian impulses are now being unleashed as they sense that they can finally achieve their goal of total domination of the universities.
At this point, pretty much all arguments with these folks are futile.
It would be like arguing with the Brownshirts.
More like the Maoists.
>irst, he believes the social justice warriors are winning their battle to control campuses.
Since the SJWs are the school administration, it’s really not a hard victory to achieve. The kids are sheep, the people directing the sheep is the admin and teaching staff.
Hey, what’s the dif?
You could reason somewhat with the brownshirts. The Germans didn’t want their culture destroyed, just socialism. They still valued their educational institutions or not.
Mao wanted China completely ignorant of its 5,000 year history and wanted all of it gone, if possible.
I dont know how that or not got at the end of my explanation of the brown shirts. It shoud not be there.
It appears as though there is a “red Guards” movement afoot on some campuses. Will we see liberal professors paraded through streets wearing dunce caps and confessing their political sins for the radicals? Time will tell.
The keys are hiring and tenure. The activists define their disciplines in terms of their agenda and build the groupthink right into the position descriptions, course descriptions and stated academic qualifications for open positions. The goal is to make every department a closed shop.
Lenin was wrong. We don’t sell them the rope. We give it to them in the form of taxpayer subsidies of so-called “higher education.”
Ground zero bought and paid for by soros and the globalists. Remember hearing an interview with one of their high ranking leaders explaining how their plans are working and their projections
Higher education has become a racket. It no longer educates, it only indoctrinated.
It appears that Hillsdale College and Liberty University are the only remaining institutions of higher education.
It is time to move engineering education to trade schools. A SJW engineer is a worthless degree.
Perhaps true “liberal arts” can become a subordinate part of a good trade school. But, “liberal arts” means the classics, true history and English. Psychology, Sociology and the rest of that drivel can be left in the ruins of the old colleges.
I’m of the opinion that every occupation be credited through professional organizations and the only thing post secondary institutions do is teach. Leave it to the professional colleges to recommend universities.
The only way to win this one is to remove the power of college degrees. We should move to a system of certifications, like computer certifications, such as MSCE, in every field.
Bkmk
Schools, such as Evergreen State College, have become “too stupid to survive”. It would be in their own interest to announce that no individual or group can prevent another person or group from exercising their 1st Amendment right of expression. To do so should result in immediate expulsion from the school.
Instead, the administrators of these schools are cowards, The SJWs know it, and freely push them around creating their own mini-version of the French Revolution Reign of Terror.
The result of allowing this uncivilized cancer to grow in these schools is declining enrollment and eventual financial failure and loss of accreditation. Ask University of Missouri.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.