Posted on 12/01/2017 8:14:27 AM PST by GIdget2004
"Mike Flynn is "prepared to testify" against Trump, his family, & the campaign, including Trump ordering him to talk to Russians"
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
A real question for many people is should the law be applied to all - Hillary and Trump - or just to our political opponents? I support applying it to all.
Oh really.
So tell me what I will be saying if Trump is hit with obstruction.
I want to bookmark it.
The plea deal has to do with lying about contacts made after the election. The plea deal has absolutely nothing to do with whatever Flynn plans to testify to against Trump et al. And unless the MSM is privy to information no on record, nobody knows what his testimony will be.
Everybody knew that you insipid twit.
The difference is were outraged and youre gloating.
Oh and if Trump is taken down youll be posting how you suspected that all along because thats what crooks get and the justice system worx.
But dont bother because it wont happen.
I think BTC futures are coming up in December on CME
Super risky.
The options will have crazy premiums.
I was thinking about bitcoin back when Kimdotcom said he was getting involved. I don’t remember the details but remember thinking this would probably be something to try.
Of course, I didn’t.
Thats a lot of words for no.
You are wrong. I will book mark this thread and find you IF it happens.
There ya go folks - she wants trump to go down.
Spoken like someone who may be a lawyer ..or knows one.
The parallels are amazing between those who supported Clinton no matter how much he lied and those who support Trump when he lies. Conservatism is too important as a way of life and as a governing philosophy to allow it to be undermined by this type of bad character.
Oh and btw,
from you:
“Everybody knew that you insipid twit.”
Posting history of so many people here shows THAT IS NOT THE CASE:
“I have consistently said FOR MONTHS that I have no idea if this will touch Trump but I did know this was a roll up type of investigation and flipping was key.”
And one day, when this is over..I am going to be pointing some things out to people who have relentlessly bashed me..and no..not everyone “knew it”
I think it will end after Flynn. Kushner and Jr. have their daddy’s money and can battle on in perpetuity. Flynn couldn’t, and I feel really sad about that as they financially drained him.
Wow....drawing a moral equivalence between Clinton and Trump......that sort of twisting like a pretzel would throw my back out!
One thing that has sorely disappointed me is the way here MOST BUT NOT ALL..have refused to acknowledge certain things..and frankly, have acted like Dems did with Clinton
Lied about what?
My argument here is that the current accusations against Trump are ... Trunped up. Talking to the Russians isnt a crime (although it seems to be now) - if they manage to connect the dots and somehow prove that Trump worked with the Russians to throw the election - up toss him out in a heartbeat just as I wanted to do with Obama and the uranium deal.
But do recall that Reagan was attacked for making a deal with Khomeini and for the Iran contra deal and never went down. And lets not even go after the stupid investigation into W where Scooter Libby got the death penalty for misremembering what he had for breakfast 2 years ago.
As expected, you didn’t answer my direct, simple yes or no question.
Thanks for proving my point...again :)
Oh and get back to me on DACA day, k?
Part of me feels bad that so many have been put through the financial ringer because of a certain few.
Jr and Kushner can afford it
Many can’t.
You may be right in that the plea deal with Flynn is the last one Mueller can get..but certainly the plea deal means there is more Mueller is going after.
Jared lied on his Security Clearance more than once. An ordinary American would have never get a clearance after this type of an obvious lie. So it is true that Trump wealth is beneficial. Regular folks are required to tell the truth. Hubris catches up with folks like Jared, though. I’m not so sure his father-in-laws vast riches can protect him from himself.
Repeat. Drop Dead
You’re inverting the notion of truth. First of all responding to vague questions about speaking /meeting. Secondly, if Trump were under oath I can assure you his lawyers would have all the disclosure necessary so he could respond under oath or FBI questioning of any meetings, speaking with etc. So your ridiculous Clinton comparison is both half - baked and stupid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.