Posted on 12/26/2017 9:44:12 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
For a long time I ignored the Luciferian stuff because I thought it was click bait. But this past year I’ve seen too much to dismiss it anymore and I am astounded just how evil people at the top want to be. They hunger for the dark, they call on it and do evil to bring it into existance. I can’t imagine the mindset of those who LOVE evil.
But there’s CERN. Have you seen the photos of the pagan/satanic rituals performed at the dedication?
How about the photo of young Anderson Cooper, his brother, and his mother Gloria Vanderbilt with the human sacrifice wall art?
The Podesta “art” collection? The cannibalism themed “dinner” for the “elite”? The wikileaks stuff. The corruption seems to be a mere symptom of the evil these people love.
Breitbart had a article back in 2012 that I just found: The Community-Organizer-in-Chief, Part One: The Alinsky Ethics and it is disgusting to read, as it is Alinsky, unvarnished by the veneer of a book.
This was a telling passage in it (from Breitbart):
*********************************************************************************
This liberal Cloak of Moral Invisibility allowed Alinsky to embrace huge contradictions, something blindingly evident in the Playboy interview. At one point, Alinsky tells a favorite story of his that is designed to give him an air of ethical superiority. As he tells it, when he was a kid he got into a fight with some other neighborhood kids and was brought in front of the local rabbi for discipline, who tells him:
ALINSKY: “You think you’re a man because you do what everybody does. But I want to tell you something the great Rabbi Hillel said: ‘Where there are no men, be thou a man.‘ I want you to remember it.” I’ve never forgotten it.
This is a great statement of moral courage: do the right thing, even if you must stand up to those around you. In fact, Alinsky used “‘Where there are no men, be thou a man” as one of the epigrams for his book Rules for Radicals.
What’s really interesting, though, is that while Alinsky claims he’s “never forgotten it,” just a few paragraphs later in the exact same interview, Saul Alinsky regales the interviewer with stories showing that he’s actually lived his life with exactly the opposite ethic. Astonishingly, he brags to Playboy about stealing, lying and consorting to murderers.
For example, Alinsky discusses his college days during the depression. He says he was “hungry.” Not starving, mind you. Hungry. Rather than using his intellect and energy to create value and earn money to feed himself, Alinsky instead figures out an elaborate scheme to defraud cafeterias.
ALINSKY: "We got the system down to a science, and for six months all of us were eating free. Then the bastards brought in those serial machines at the door where you pull out a ticket that’s only good for that particular cafeteria. That was a low blow. We were the first victims of automation."
When asked by the interviewer if he “any moral qualms about ripping off the cafeterias?”, he responded:
ALINSKY: "Are you kidding? I wouldn’t have justified, say, conning free gin from a liquor store just so I could have a martini before dinner, but when you’re hungry, anything goes — There’s a priority of rights, and the right to eat takes precedence over the right to make a profit — and just in case you’re getting any ideas, let me remind you that the statute of limitations has run out."
So much for “Where there are no men, be thou a man”; Saul Alinsky was actually the one organizing the other students into stealing. Alinsky’s avowed situational ethic won out over the word of Rabbi Hillel which mean that the owners and employees of the cafeteria had no right to profit because Alisnky decided they didn’t–and “to each according to his need” and all that, man.
*********************************************************************************
I made myself finish reading "Rules for Radicals" then decided I was going to dictate and audiobook version to distribute to anyone I knew who would be interested, but...I couldn't do it. I gave up after a chapter. I couldn't read it without revealing the disgust in my voice as I dictated. Ugh.
Satan worship is the thread that ties all of the left’s many facets all together in one neat, tidy little bundle.
Amen!
There have been several articles in the last week that casually and off handedly reference Marina Abramovic in an attempt, IMO, to rehabilitate her and act as if Spirit Cooking never happened.
I read 2 of these articles here on FR. They only casually reference her.
There are no coincidences. An Elite is attempting to rehabilitate her in the eyes of the public.
But why?
There are others that willingly serve Moloch. Many, many others.
The "satanists" of the Middle Ages recited the Latin mass backwards, hung the crucifix upside down, and "desecrated" the host. Today's "luciferians" (and I have no doubt they exist) invert the Fundamentalist Protestant worldview as the "satanists" inverted the Catholic worldview. This explains the sudden and otherwise inexplicable love affair with islam. The upside down chrstians have discovered American Fundamentalism, with its philo-Semitism and opposition to islam. The Jews went from being the number one stick to hit chrstians over the head with to being treated as sort of a senior auxiliary.
However, just as medieval "satanism" didn't automatically make Catholicism true, the same applies to today's "luciferians" and American Fundamentalist Protestantism. Christans and their inverted counterparts actually agree on a great number of false beliefs (merely taking opposite sides, as I stated before). The only "Lucifer" that has ever been is merely a planet. HaSatan is just another of G-d's angels who carries out his assigned tasks. And there is no independent supernatural evil entity who opposes G-d. G-d's rule is absolute, supreme, and contested only by humans. This false dualistic worldview needs to be replaced with the serene knowledge that all works according to the Will of G-d alone.
David HaMelekh (`alayv hashalom) was never a chrstian and never prophesied anything about J*sus Chr*st. Sorry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.