Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justa-hairyape

21 climate models in use isn’t “settled science.” When they get to a single model, then go around saying you have a consensus. Until then you got gotz.


18 posted on 12/29/2017 1:25:19 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Delusional - Adjective, Describes a Democrat or member of the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: EQAndyBuzz

The past two weeks in West Texas I would have been impressed if they could accurately predict temperatures within 5 degrees F the day before. They missed the high temp by over 10 degrees here the past few days. Always predicting too warm. Two days out they were 20 degrees off the mark yesterday. Pathetic. In the mean time people got caught too lightly dressed. And we’re not even talking actual heat indexes which would have been even more innacurate.


22 posted on 12/29/2017 3:02:06 AM PST by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: EQAndyBuzz

The number actually doesnt matter. A computer simulation isnt “settled science” no matter how many simulation models they run. These models cannot correctly predict Thursday’s temperature on a Monday (I have cross checked many times) and they want us to believe prediction 50 years out? A settled science is a law, like F = MA or K.E = 1/2mv**2. There is no law that gives us earth’s temperature on a given date.


24 posted on 12/29/2017 3:16:08 AM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson