Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Training Officers to Shoot First, and He Will Answer Questions Later
NY Times ^

Posted on 01/05/2018 10:45:05 AM PST by JP1201

WASHINGTON — The shooting looked bad. But that is when the professor is at his best. A black motorist, pulled to the side of the road for a turn-signal violation, had stuffed his hand into his pocket. The white officer yelled for him to take it out. When the driver started to comply, the officer shot him dead.

The driver was unarmed.

Taking the stand at a public inquest, William J. Lewinski, the psychology professor, explained that the officer had no choice but to act.

“In simple terms,” the district attorney in Portland, Ore., asked, “if I see the gun, I’m dead?”

“In simple terms, that’s it,” Dr. Lewinski replied.

When police officers shoot people under questionable circumstances, Dr. Lewinski is often there to defend their actions. Among the most influential voices on the subject, he has testified in or consulted in nearly 200 cases over the last decade or so and has helped justify countless shootings around the country.

His conclusions are consistent: The officer acted appropriately, even when shooting an unarmed person. Even when shooting someone in the back. Even when witness testimony, forensic evidence or video footage contradicts the officer’s story.

(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; leo; shooting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 last
To: JP1201
The NYT never lets a law enforcement crisis go to waste.

Neither did Janet Reno, as the State Attorney in Miami (Florida's 11th district). Too many FReepers are falling for one (NYT's) side of the story.

101 posted on 01/05/2018 9:40:28 PM PST by Does so (McAuliffe's Charlottesville...and...The Walter Duranty Press"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

True.

The rules in Iraq were relaxed somewhat as the threats didn’t wear uniforms so one could never be 100% sure someone wasn’t a threat.

There was a lot more leeway given to “fear” defenses if shots were fired.

However, surprisingly enough, there were fewer cases of our military being wrong than there seem to be with the cops being wrong.


102 posted on 01/08/2018 10:41:18 AM PST by DBG8489
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: donna

Bullshit.

In Iraq the enemy could have been just about anyone - and at times it was.

They didn’t give us the courtesy of wearing uniforms or anything and they weren’t limited to “men of fighting age”.

At any given time, the enemy was “someone other than us.”

And somehow we didn’t manage to cap off innocent people as often as cops seem to here in the states.


103 posted on 01/08/2018 10:45:15 AM PST by DBG8489
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson