Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Training Officers to Shoot First, and He Will Answer Questions Later
NY Times ^

Posted on 01/05/2018 10:45:05 AM PST by JP1201

WASHINGTON — The shooting looked bad. But that is when the professor is at his best. A black motorist, pulled to the side of the road for a turn-signal violation, had stuffed his hand into his pocket. The white officer yelled for him to take it out. When the driver started to comply, the officer shot him dead.

The driver was unarmed.

Taking the stand at a public inquest, William J. Lewinski, the psychology professor, explained that the officer had no choice but to act.

“In simple terms,” the district attorney in Portland, Ore., asked, “if I see the gun, I’m dead?”

“In simple terms, that’s it,” Dr. Lewinski replied.

When police officers shoot people under questionable circumstances, Dr. Lewinski is often there to defend their actions. Among the most influential voices on the subject, he has testified in or consulted in nearly 200 cases over the last decade or so and has helped justify countless shootings around the country.

His conclusions are consistent: The officer acted appropriately, even when shooting an unarmed person. Even when shooting someone in the back. Even when witness testimony, forensic evidence or video footage contradicts the officer’s story.

(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; leo; shooting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: fr_freak

Thank you for your service. The comment stands I doubt all doing the sniping here are combat veterans. I would also guess there is a difference between military service and engagement and police engagement. Not saying one requires more courage or training than another just different


21 posted on 01/05/2018 11:08:07 AM PST by Mom MD ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JP1201

Listening to a cop barking orders with a gun to your head should not be a life or death situation. Its not constitutional. And its a slipper slope to police doing this with everyone not just black people or people who are low lifes. A cop should not pull his gun unless there is some reason to assume danger. If you were white with a suit, the cop would let you put your hands in your pocket, reach into your glove compartment and check under your seat. But if the cop is scared for no fault of your own and you do something normal but in the eyes of a cop who does not have the nerve to be a cop., you could be dead.


22 posted on 01/05/2018 11:08:12 AM PST by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sagar

But that’s not the truth.


23 posted on 01/05/2018 11:11:02 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD

Someone breaking into my house at 2 AM, I will call Mr Smith and Mr Wesson.

Then I will seek to change the perp’s heart and mind. Two in the heart, one in the mind.

Then I will place my weapon on the floor at my feet, grab my cell phone and go outside. I will prepare to lie down, arms out, and my ID near my head.

Only then will I call the police.

“A man* was breaking into my house. I was in fear for my life, and I shot him. I am unarmed, lying on the ground outside my home. I will say no more without an attorney present.”

*usually


24 posted on 01/05/2018 11:13:00 AM PST by ExGeeEye (For dark is the suede that mows like a harvest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD

I’m only saying that the “cops can kill with impunity” paradigm will inevitably lead to more cop deaths.


25 posted on 01/05/2018 11:13:07 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MeganC
the cops need to start acting like Americans instead of the armed force that’s occupying America

When police spokespeople refer to police interaction with the public and they mostly refer to the public as 'civilians' not citizens. Them it is a safe assumption that the police in large part depict the public as the 'enemy'. May go back to the 60's when police started hiring officers straight out of the military without adequate decompression time and transition to alter the mindset that civilians are the enemy. All conflicts since the 60's in large part pitted US forces against an enemy entrenched deeply in the civilian population so forces could not definitely determine the enemy until they got first licks in. From Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan forces have to deal with deaths by seemed civilian. but in fact were enemy combatants. Then they separate from service and enter police departments where without some time to decompress and retrain, the automatic reaction against an enemy that turn out is some schlub in a traffic stop shot for holding a cell phone.

26 posted on 01/05/2018 11:13:43 AM PST by redcatcherb412 (Emerged intact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ExGeeEye

Well good for you. Most of those talking trash about the police are the first to call them when things get crazy.


27 posted on 01/05/2018 11:16:11 AM PST by Mom MD ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ExGeeEye
“A man* was breaking into my house. I was in fear for my life, and I shot him. I am unarmed, lying on the ground outside my home. I will say no more without an attorney present.”

And if the cops kill you anyway, they'll likely walk away scot free.

28 posted on 01/05/2018 11:16:14 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: donna
In war time, you know who the enemy is.

No. You don't. And you are STILL not allowed to act like that.

Cops don’t have that benefit.

So cops are allowed to see everyone not currently on duty as a police officer as a threat yet the military in combat is able to distinguish between combatant and noncombatant.

Do you have any idea how insane you sound?

Or perhaps ignorant is the correct word.

29 posted on 01/05/2018 11:20:51 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles! (pink bow))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DBG8489

Well put.


30 posted on 01/05/2018 11:22:09 AM PST by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JP1201

These anarchists are the first to denigrate and question anything from the NY Times, except when it comes to Law Enforcement. They then swallow the kool-aid and proclaim 99% of LEOs are murderers and thieves.

Having had the privilege of reading much of Dr. Lewiski’s writings, I can verify that the entire article was slanted.

Flame away


31 posted on 01/05/2018 11:22:19 AM PST by Glennb51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JP1201

If the account is correct, the cop’s command and then his shooting of the subject when he composed is totally unjustifiable.


32 posted on 01/05/2018 11:23:09 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD

Hate to say but there are too many cases of people calling the police for burglars or prowlers and when the police show up they kill the person who called them.

But it’s all perfectly justifiable so it’s okay.


33 posted on 01/05/2018 11:24:05 AM PST by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD
So when someone is breaking into your house at 2 am who are you going to call?

Why the heck would I call the police? By the time they got there I would be dead. And if I was not then they would likely correct that error.

They get called AFTER the problem has been dealt with so they can do what they are paid to do. Paper work.

34 posted on 01/05/2018 11:24:19 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles! (pink bow))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sagar

Did you read the article?

The case described in the opening of the story is one in which a police officer told a motorist to remove his hand from his pocket and them shot him when he complied.

The motorist was obeying the officer’s instructions.


35 posted on 01/05/2018 11:25:28 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DBG8489

Spot on! Thank you.


36 posted on 01/05/2018 11:26:21 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

If the account is correct, the cop’s command and then his shooting of the subject when he composed is totally unjustifiable.
________________________
meant to say “complied” not composed.


37 posted on 01/05/2018 11:26:21 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JP1201
I mention this whenever these threads come up and FR starts sounding like an Antifa rally -- out of a nation of 315 million people, including literally thousands if not millions of foreign organized crime members from south if the border, there were fewer than 1000 fatal shootinga by police in 2017. Roughly 750k LE in the US, conducting dozens of ineractions per day with people from all walks of life, being involved in any number of hairy situations, and the rate could justifiably be expected to be much higher. But it's not.

Too many FReepers fall for the media scamming to make this seem like a bigger problem than it is. Understanding that fatal shootings aren't the only issue here, rest assured that you are very, very likely to survive your next speeding ticket.

38 posted on 01/05/2018 11:27:26 AM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Flag burners can go screw -- I'm mighty PROUD of that ragged old flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

As much as lawyers have a reputation for dishonesty, far and away the biggest liars in the trial courts are the “experts” hired by civil-suit plaintiffs and criminal defendants.

Not saying THIS guy is a liar, of course.


39 posted on 01/05/2018 11:28:39 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JP1201

I’d be happy to see this bastard on trial and given a life sentence.

A cop that shoots under those circumstances should be sentence to general population at a nasty prison.


40 posted on 01/05/2018 11:30:08 AM PST by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, deport all illegals, abolish the DEA, IRS and ATF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson