[generally]

And this is EXACTLY why Hitlery made those comments about it being un-American, un-patriotic to not accept the results of an election.

She was positive they had it rigged for her, and she needed to squash - in advance - the idea of investigating it or not accepting it. This is one of the best pieces of evidence we can use against her. This tells us that she knew from the start it was rigged and that there was a lot of dirty dealing going on.

It would be interesting to find the dates of her “accept the results” remarks. That would give us the latest possible date that she knew and that the rigging was going on. (The real roots of the sleazy weaponization of the government agencies probably goes back at least to the Bill Clinton administration.)

[Diana in Wisconsin]

‘She Who Shall Not Be Named’ first stated that in late summer of 2016 and then used it in all of her speeches from that point on:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/11/28/oh-that-time-when-clinton-said-anyone-who-doesnt-accept-the-results-of-an-election-is-a-threat-to-democracy-n2251780