[boatbums]

I just read the WP article and didn’t think it was “Satanic” at all. It talks fairly about the real-world problems the family has faced together as Graham’s evangelistic ministry took priority in their lives - much like, I imagine, the first century Apostles did in spreading the gospel to all the world. I don’t like the title, of course, but I do not think it was a malicious article.

[M. Thatcher]

It talks fairly about the real-world problems the family has faced

Fine — next month. Or last month. But releasing it within hours of his death is beneath contempt.

[HiTech RedNeck]

It’s world-grade cattiness, but its very presence proves the point. The better you exercise Christianity, the more the world will execrate you.

As for Franklin, he’s not smoldering over the problems.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Got to remember this is for the world’s consumption. It is to say Humph! If Billy was such a holy man then why this? This? This?

Yup. The devil we say. And it’s a tribute to Billy that the devil hated him so!!

[Sir_Ed]

I thought it was a fair article...

Ed

[Gene Eric]

>> I don’t like the title

It’s a divisive title.

[MarvinStinson]

Crap like this is why Donald Trump won.

[FreedomNotSafety]

Anyone in ministry or has been close to a pastor like Graham will appreciate this article. I came away with a deeper respect for all of them.

[Mr Ramsbotham]

I just read the WP article and didn’t think it was “Satanic” at all. It talks fairly about the real-world problems the family has faced together as Graham’s evangelistic ministry took priority in their lives - much like, I imagine, the first century Apostles did in spreading the gospel to all the world. I don’t like the title, of course, but I do not think it was a malicious article.

I think the timing of it was what's considered objectionable.