Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Parkland Officer’s Hesitation To Stop Shooting Fits A Pattern Of Police Cowardice
The Federalist ^ | 2/23/18 | Michael Graham

Posted on 02/23/2018 5:52:00 AM PST by Sopater

My uncle John is a retired Los Angeles police officer. He doesn’t like to talk about it, but if I buy him enough drinks, he’ll tell how he captured an armed bad guy on the streets of LA, although my uncle was off-duty and unarmed.

The story involves car chases, foot chases, and a shotgun—and the guy holding it wasn’t my uncle. Fortunately, everything worked out that day, and a dangerous criminal was off the streets because my uncle risked his life—off the clock.

I think about my Uncle John every time I read an all-too-frequent report like this one: “The armed school resource officer assigned to protect students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School took a defensive position outside the school and did not enter the building while the shooter was killing students and teachers inside [all emphasis added] with an AR-15 assault-style rifle, Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel said Thursday.”

Most Americans are astonished and outraged to hear this. How can a police officer—how can any person—stand around listening to innocent kids being shot?

Most Americans don’t know this happens all the time. Remember the Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando?

As the largest mass shooting [at that time] in modern U.S. history began to unfold, an off-duty police officer working at a gay nightclub exchanged gunfire with the suspect. But three hours passed before one of the nation’s most revered SWAT teams stormed the building and brought the attack that left 49 people and the gunman dead to an end.

The ISIS-wannabe was in a shoot-out with a cop before he even got in the building. But for some reason, the cop didn’t follow him in. Shots fired inside. Nothing. Then SWAT waited outside, even as shots rang out from inside the building.

Remember Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut? “Newtown officers arrived at the school while the gunman was still shooting but did not enter the building for more than five minutes, according to a prosecutor’s report.” The state police conducted a comprehensive review of events that day, but “didn’t interview any Newtown police officers who were the first responders on the scene.” Newtown police didn’t do their own after-action report, either. What’s to review, right?

This list goes on and on. Up in Canada during the 1898 massacres at Ecole Polytechnique: “As officers stood outside in the snow, [the shooter] moved through the corridors looking for more women to kill.” Out west in Columbine, as in Orlando, the cops exchanged fire with the killers, then waited outside as 10 people were gunned down. The police waited outside. Listening.

The sinking feeling we have as we read these stories isn’t anger. It’s betrayal. Our police are supposed to be better than that. We honor them, we tell our kids to look up to them, we buy them lunch, donate to their charities, we believe in them. That’s because we believe they’ve made a commitment to endanger their own lives to protect ours.

Only not everyone is in on the deal, apparently. Over the years as a radio talk host, I’ve had a dozen or so callers claiming to be cops who angrily insisted that, as one put it “Our first job is to make sure we go home to our families safe at night.”

My response was to suggest that, somewhere, there was a mall missing a security guard. For real cops, if someone is going to get shot—either an innocent civilian or themselves—their job is to take that bullet if they absolutely must.

So why do so many cops stand outside and do nothing while kids are being killed? Well, cowardice, for one thing. No, not all cops are cowards, that’s ridiculous. I know from personal experience that’s not true. But they’re not all heroes, either.

Ask yourself this: Could you stand outside and listen to high school kids get shot and do nothing? Particularly if you had a gun and the training to use it? Wouldn’t every cell in your body scream for you to run inside and kill that SOB?

So why do good cops wait? Training. It’s part of a tactical approach currently debated by police departments across the country. Before Columbine, everyone pretty much waited: Set up a perimeter, wait for SWAT, go in with mass firepower and a strategy to reduce civilian casualties. That doesn’t work if all the civilians are already dead.

So the strategy changed—or was supposed to. But as we’ve seen again and again, in some places, it hasn’t. This brings up the conversation nobody wants to have: It’s a lot easier to police good people than bad ones.

Sheriff Scott Israel, whose department had dozens of encounters with the Parkland shooter before the massacre but failed to take action, was on CNN insisting that the solution to gun crime is out of his hands. So he wants to get guns out of yours. He’s demanding restrictions on the gun rights of lawful citizens.

He couldn’t figure out how to get the information about the Parkland psycho into the background-check system, which would have stopped an actual bad guy from legally buying a gun. Instead, he wants to stop everyone. Why? Because law-abiding citizens abide by the law. We do what they’re told. We’re easy to police. So his failures are apparently on us to solve by giving up our rights.

The same with suburban teenagers posting crazy stuff on the Internet. Israel also wants police to have the power to detain people without a warrant, take them in against their will, and give them a government -authorized evaluation of some kind—all based on a police officer’s opinion that you’ve posted something “disturbing” on the web. Hey, there are plenty of angst-ridden teen boys out there to roust, and cops like Israel are more than happy to do it.

Scaring dopey teens and banning AR-15s is easy. Following up on truly dangerous people, building a case about their mental health, getting the evidence a judge needs to act—that’s hard work. So is going into a building where shots are being fired. Cops aren’t heroes for doing “easy.” They are heroes—and most of them are—for doing the hard stuff.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2a; defense; parkland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
This is why we need to be able to defend ourselves with whatever force we can bring,
1 posted on 02/23/2018 5:52:00 AM PST by Sopater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Organizational Failure - bump for later...


2 posted on 02/23/2018 5:54:40 AM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

The school job is certain political reward for services rendered to the political machine running the broward county Utopia

Kumbaya kills kids


3 posted on 02/23/2018 5:54:41 AM PST by Thibodeaux (The FISA judge is corrupt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Police officers don’t want to act if they shoot a suspect and are left out to hang to dry by their brass.

Its just politically correct and safer to do nothing.


4 posted on 02/23/2018 5:55:06 AM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

This has got me thinking...A coward, but because he was afraid for his own skin? Or afraid of lawsuits? An expression has been coined: Stay Fetal. Was his cowardice a character flaw? Or policy?


5 posted on 02/23/2018 5:55:24 AM PST by mewzilla (Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Any teacher who wants to carry should be allowed to after proper training. Maybe they could be deputized for in-school purposes.


6 posted on 02/23/2018 5:58:31 AM PST by libertylover (Kurt Schlicter: "They wonder why they got Trump. They are why they got Trump")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
A coward, but because he was afraid for his own skin? Or afraid of lawsuits?

When he has agreed to take a position as a protector, who is used as justification for disarming EVERYONE ELSE who comes to that place, which of those excuses, singularly or all together, are sufficient for shirking your duty and allowing a massacre to go unchallenged?
7 posted on 02/23/2018 5:59:31 AM PST by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

The heroes were a coach and a couple ROTC kids who were not armed. A badge and a gun does not a hero make in the real world.


8 posted on 02/23/2018 6:00:37 AM PST by Spok ("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

If it’s a character flaw, then it’s down to one bad hire. If Stay Fetal is district and county policy, then the problem is systemic and blaming one guy won’t solve it. The policy needs to change.


9 posted on 02/23/2018 6:02:14 AM PST by mewzilla (Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
I pray every morning that I never have to draw my concealed weapons. And, I pray, that if I do, I have the courage to use them!

That said, this officer is sworn to uphold law and to PROTECT and serve!

10 posted on 02/23/2018 6:03:46 AM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

The best defense against this slaughter is to train and vet teachers and administrators who are on the inside of the building when the slaughter starts with a secretly concealed carry weapon.


11 posted on 02/23/2018 6:07:04 AM PST by Uncle Lonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

Back when that guy went into the texas tower and started shooting people the Texas police and a civilian worked their way up to the top and killed him. Guess cops back then were different.


12 posted on 02/23/2018 6:09:45 AM PST by Yorlik803
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

while students were being shot inside, he “took a defensive position outside”

hmmmm.... In other words he ran and hid.

I am glad this guy quit.


13 posted on 02/23/2018 6:11:06 AM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

marked ,,,,


14 posted on 02/23/2018 6:13:14 AM PST by piroque ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

I was thinking that same thing. I guess he’ll have a lot of time to figure that out, regardless, his name will forever be linked to cowardice, not institutionalized dysfunction.

I have recently retooled my career to become a nurse (another profession which is placed high on a pedestal) and I find it amazing to watch how decisions are made. No good deed goes unpunished.


15 posted on 02/23/2018 6:15:10 AM PST by incredulous joe ("No road is too long with good company" Turkish Proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Yorlik803

Heroes are where you find them. Google “Rodger Wilton Young”,


16 posted on 02/23/2018 6:16:21 AM PST by Spok ("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Road Warrior ‘04
I pray every morning that I never have to draw my concealed weapons. And, I pray, that if I do, I have the courage to use them!

That said, this officer is sworn to uphold law and to PROTECT and serve!


Agreed. Those who choose to carry concealed for the protection of themselves have the liberty of choosing whether or not to engage a violent threat. When others are depending on you, that liberty diminishes and you now have a duty and responsibility to do what you have to do, even if you would rather not.
18 posted on 02/23/2018 6:18:24 AM PST by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
No doubt this man is representative of the people who hired him.

No doubt.
19 posted on 02/23/2018 6:19:51 AM PST by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: incredulous joe

Meanwhile, ironically he has police protection guarding him and his family. Will THEY take a bullet for him?


20 posted on 02/23/2018 6:23:14 AM PST by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson