Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/04/2018 5:11:53 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin
👍🏼😡
2 posted on 03/04/2018 5:20:58 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
..remember what happens when you attempt to compromise with people whose ultimate goal is your obliteration and why no amount of compromise will ever be enough.

Truer words have never been delineated.

The property rights of restaurant owners are not the only ones that have been abridged. The crux of this matter is the stealth elimination (unconstitutional in its method) of the 2nd Amendment. One has only to look in horror at England and Australia to see whole populations of citizens bereft of their rights to self protection.
In these countries, examples abound where not only are citizens stripped of firearms, but their governments have criminalized any attempt at self defense.

I hope we, the people, do not surrender to such tyranny.

4 posted on 03/04/2018 5:45:31 AM PST by Thommas (The snout of the camel is in the tent..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Disarming law abiding citizens will not deter crazies, criminals and terrorists.

5 posted on 03/04/2018 6:01:17 AM PST by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This article is spot on. If you point out the obvious true goal, they accuse you of making a straw man argument. We have to counter that with evidence of the true goal.

I find it kind of ironic that if the true goal was not total confiscation of all firearms, they might actually get some of the legislation that are proposing.


8 posted on 03/04/2018 6:09:27 AM PST by beef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Absolutely. No expanded background checks. I do t want some BS where Feds can troll through medical records or controlled substances databases to look for “mental health” issues. That would destroy 2nd and 4th at the same time.


15 posted on 03/04/2018 7:05:42 AM PST by grumpygresh (When will Soros be brought to justice? Crush the vermin, crush the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If the left wants to get rid of crime and something that doesn’t help public safety, get rid of criminal correction. Bring back the death penalty and expand it.


17 posted on 03/04/2018 8:11:35 AM PST by Retvet (Retvet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Part of me had hoped the party of grave-dancing would find using children in this way would be a bridge too far, but the rest of me knew they didn’t have it in them to be tactful, decent people.
The reason is simple; socialism is cynicism. Cynicism towards society and concomitant faith in government.

That combination plays into journalism’s sweet spot. Journalism is fundamentally about bad news - and that can take the form of people and institutions failing society - and also government failing to do enough to prevent said failures. The failings of society very easily translate into goals for more government.


28 posted on 03/04/2018 10:45:29 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Presses can be 'associated,' or presses can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If you give up a piece of your rights when someone abuses theirs; then soon you will have no rights and the freedom they protect.


29 posted on 03/04/2018 10:51:31 AM PST by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
To paraphrase Carolla, there was a time when you could smoke in restaurants.

The East German Communists called it "The Artichoke Principle" - peel off one leaf at a time until you have nothing left.

I saw this in real life when I worked at Brown & Williamson (cigarette makers) in Macon, GA in the '90s. At first our programming section was on a rented floor in a GEICO building. They had a No Smoking policy for their staff, so those who did came up to our floor and smoked in the stairwell. The some pressure was applied and our stairwell was off limits. Then they had to smoke outside the building, so they hovered around the entrance. That projected "A Bad Image" for GEICO, so they had to move 50 yards away. Evidently that was too short a range, so they couldn't smoke at all on GEICO property.

When we'd go out for lunch, we'd see those employees a couple of hundred yards off, smoking near the treeline. I would imagine that, at the end, if you were a smoker, you either lost the job you had there or were not hired.

30 posted on 03/04/2018 1:51:53 PM PST by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson