Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Comments, Please!!!
1 posted on 03/14/2018 2:49:46 PM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JLAGRAYFOX

Bookmark


2 posted on 03/14/2018 2:51:23 PM PDT by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

I don’t know of any media outlet who had Saccone up by 14 points at any time within the past few months, much less yesterday. If the Times was predicting that then either they were mistaken or stupid.


3 posted on 03/14/2018 2:53:15 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

It’s a left-wing newspaper, what do you expect?

Yeah I agree they do a good job on election reporting. But see statement 1 above.


4 posted on 03/14/2018 2:58:08 PM PDT by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust Sessions. The Great Awakening is at hand...MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

7 posted on 03/14/2018 3:00:40 PM PDT by C210N (Republicans sign check fronts; 'Rats sign check backs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

I was watching the NY Times site pretty closely and never saw them give Saccone a 62% chance. The reason they took the predictor down was because Westmoreland County (a Republican county) was not providing precinct-level results. Therefore the Times was not able to use its modeling from past elections to make a prediction for this one based on incoming precinct results.


8 posted on 03/14/2018 3:01:21 PM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

Sniff - Sniff, EW ICK, I smell something stinking. What is that ODER?


11 posted on 03/14/2018 3:05:45 PM PDT by SandRat (! Whar is that smell?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

You know it! They’ve been doing it for years.


13 posted on 03/14/2018 3:12:23 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

The number of absentee ballots in Alleghany were about 5% more than what Lamb was running in that county. Enough to make a difference.


15 posted on 03/14/2018 3:14:23 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

Of course. Fraud always works for RATs because the GOPe is complicit.


16 posted on 03/14/2018 3:14:59 PM PDT by dforest (Never let a Muslim cut your hair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX
Allegheny Co. / Pittsburgh is second only to Philly in the voter fraud department.

Years ago a local news station filmed Tim Stevens, head of the local NAACP driving van loads of patients from mental hospitals to the polls.

They had lists of candidates tho vote for written on their hands.

The Dems go to nursing homes and care facilities and "help" the patients vote the "right way".

Of course they have absentee ballot fraud down to a science.

Don't know how the rank and file voted but even after almost destroying the coal and steel industries the unions still support the Dems.

18 posted on 03/14/2018 3:24:13 PM PDT by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX; Diogenesis

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3639519/posts?page=213#213

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3639519/posts?page=216#216

(H/t diogenesis)


19 posted on 03/14/2018 3:53:55 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

I flipped between NYTIMES and the PA SOS site.
After awhile they stopped their future projections.
However, their counts were always just a tad ahead of the PA SOS numbers and were not off.


21 posted on 03/14/2018 4:06:32 PM PDT by stylin19a (Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

Yes, many dems (with a conscience) admittedly know there was election fraud in this large voting bloc that suddenly came in. Absentee ballots MUST to be investigated thoroughly.... cross checked....and eventually banned. Too much fraud by Dems.


22 posted on 03/14/2018 4:48:02 PM PDT by LOVETRUMP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

THE “LAMB” ABSENTEE. BALLOTS. DO. LIE.

HAVE WE NOT LEARNED ANYTHING FROM ALABAMA.


23 posted on 03/14/2018 4:50:44 PM PDT by LOVETRUMP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX
.
Every special election is controlled by fraud.
.
24 posted on 03/14/2018 5:04:53 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson