Posted on 04/21/2018 7:17:50 PM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
You have to remember that much of the Texas "Hispanic" population were original settlers before the arrival of Anglos, and are no more fond of the surge of illegals than any other group of US citizens, and possibly less.
As I see it, not distinguishing between the populations of "illegal Hispanic" and "citizen Hispanic" is a major flaw in these maps, and is probably why the "citizenship question" was added to the coming 2020 census form.
How about a map of the muzzies in the USA? The illegals?
Interesting...a county in Maine increased their Hispanic population by more than 100%. Of course if a Hispanic family of four moved to most Maine Counties, it would increase the population by 100%...
There will be fewer of them next time because of the citizenship question.
When I worked in data processing many years ago there was a term we often used: garbage in, garbage out (GIGO). The census, which relies on the honor system, is a prime example of GIGO.
One thing that hasn’t got a lot of publicity is the Far East, Asian population in the
USA. Those numbers have increased and corresponding the illegals from that group
have also. They come in legally on visas but fail to leave when the visas expire.
It is estimated that their numbers are as high as the illegals from the south.
Here’s some articles on the topic
https://www.google.com/search?q=visa+overstays&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1
Republicans don't elect many Mexicans, blacks, and jews.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.