Damn he’s good.
Well, well, well. Will Rosenstein/Mueller have to reimburse the taxpayers for the money they wasted?
The left are famous for their show trials.
Deep state privilege.
background
The Five Eyes, often abbreviated as FVEY, is an intelligence alliance comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States. These countries are parties to the multilateral UKUSA Agreement, a treaty for joint cooperation in signals intelligence.[1][2][
One way to summarize the point of his announcement is he reveals that Sid and other Clinton subterranean creatures used the United States Department of State as a channel to back-feed vile lies back into the intelligence loop of our nation to poison an election.
One call from Hitlery was all it took. And Odunga is knee deep in this sh*t, too.
As far as I can see, without reasonable suspicion or probable cause, an investigation is probably illegal.
bttt
Call RosenWeasel over to do some ‘splainin’.
Sounds like an “insurance” plan”.
Bump!
Blumenthal/Shear provide rumors and innuendo to the State Dept.
State Dept funnels the rumors to the FBI
Hillary and the DNC use a law firm that hires Fusion GPS that hires Steele
FBI provides rumors to Steele
Steele launders the rumors by including them in the Steele Dossier
Fusion GPS/Steele/Ohr provide Dossier and other rumors to FBI
Senator McCain's assistant flies to Europe to get a copy of the Dossier
McCain provides copy of Dossier to Comey
DOJ and FBI use Dossier as basis for a FISA application
CNN/other media have copies of the Dossier, but don't report it because it can't be verified
Comey briefs President on the "pee-pee" rumor from Dossier
CNN now has "news hook" to justify writing about the Dossier
Without a real intelligence trail or source, it’s now provable the affiants that obtained the FISA warrant fabricated the Probable Cause.
And EVERYONE involved in it conspired to Deny Civil Rights Under the Color of Law. They also conspired to Defraud the Federal Government.
And that’s in addition to the criminality that ensued afterward...all the surveillance, harassment, leaks and monies spent.
Every one who signed off on that FISA application and the subsequent applications are in major legal jeopardy.
It’s starting to get to a large amount of evidence for Trump to fire the remaining employed perpetrators.
WOW!!, looks like things are heating up!, but is Nunes really up to the Job??
Congress has ALL the power in washington, the executive and judicial branch operate according to the whims of CONGRESS!
“U.S. CODE
TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS
CHAPTER 6—CONGRESSIONAL AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE; INVESTIGATIONS
Sec. 193. Privilege of witnesses
No witness is privileged to refuse to testify to any fact, or to produce any paper, respecting which he shall be examined by either House of Congress, or by any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or by any committee of either House, upon the ground that his testimony to such fact or his production of such paper may tend to disgrace him or otherwise render him infamous.”
Simply look up Hinds Precedents, especially chapters 53 and 51, and Cannon’s Precedents, especially chapters 184-185. You’ll find numerous detailed cases of Congress asserting its power, arresting people, holding them until they agreed to answer questions, and then releasing them. Some of these people did not refuse to appear, but simply failed to satisfactorily answer questions. One has to wonder how a previous Congress might have responded to Alberto Gonzales’s endless recitations of “I do not recall.”
Congress can Remove the President
Congress can remove the head of every executive agency Congress can remove ALL of their employees
Congress can Abolish every agency they so choose
Congress can remove EVERY JUDGE IN AMERICA, including every supreme court justice.
Congress can abolish every federal court except the supreme Court
Congress can decide which cases the Judicial Branch can hear and decide
CONGRESS can Imprison ANYONE they want for any reason they so desire for as long as they wish.
Congress can declare WAR
No other governing body has even 10% of the power CONGRESS has!!
CONGRESS IS ALLOWING ALL OF IT!!!
Congress has the authority to arrest and imprison those found in Contempt. The power extends throughout the United States and is an inherent power (does not depend upon legislated act)
If found in Contempt the person can be arrested under a warrant of the Speaker of the House of Representatives or President of the Senate, by the respective Sergeant at Arms.
Statutory criminal contempt is an alternative to inherent contempt.
Under the inherent contempt power Congress may imprison a person for a specific period of time or an indefinite period of time, except a person imprisoned by the House of Representatives may not be imprisoned beyond adjournment of a session of Congress.
Imprisonment may be coercive or punitive.
Some references
[1] Joseph Storys Commentaries on the Constitution, Volume 2, § 842 http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/print_documents/a1_5s21.html
[2] Anderson v. Dunn - 19 U.S. 204 - And, as to the distance to which the process might reach, it is very clear that there exists no reason for confining its operation to the limits of the District of Columbia; after passing those limits, we know no bounds that can be prescribed to its range but those of the United States. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/204/case.html
[3] Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/125/case.html 73rd Cong., 78 Cong. Rec. 2410 (1934) https://archive.org/details/congressionalrec78aunit
[4] McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135 - Under a warrant issued by the President of the Senate the Deputy to the Senate Sergeant at Arms arrested at Cincinnati, Ohio, Mally S. Daugherty, who had been twice subpoenaed by the Senate and twice failed to appear. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/135/case.html
[5] Rules of the House of Representatives, Rule IV Duties of the Sergeant at Arms - [] execute the commands of the House, and all processes issued by authority thereof, directed to him by the Speaker. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/HMAN-105/pdf/HMAN-105-pg348.pdf
[6] An analysis of Congressional inquiry, subpoena, and enforcement http://www.constitutionproject.org/documents/when-congress-comes-calling-a-primer-on-the-principles-practices-and-pragmatics-of-legislative-inquiry/
In 1857, a New York Times reporter refused to say which members of Congress had asked him to get them bribes (protecting his “sources” just as various Judith Millers today protect the people who feed them proven lies that costs thousands of lives), so Congress locked him up until he answered and then banned him from Congress.
In 1924 an oil executive appeared but refused to answer certain questions, so the Senate held — literally held — him in contempt. Senator Thomas Walsh of Montana argued that this question of contempt was of the gravest importance, and that it involved “the very life of the effective existence of the House of Representatives of the United States and of the Senate of the United States.” The matter was taken to court, and the witness fined and imprisoned.
What would have been the source of this info?