Yes, he has a duty to complete this investigation, without straying off into the hinterlands, seeking out process crimes. Time for him to wrap it up.
So if he strays off and starts sniffing a trail that could lead to indictments of the Clinton Foundation you want him to cease?
Yes, he has a duty to complete this investigation into Hillary, the Clinton Foundation, and the Deep State corruption.
He has no boundaries, thus nothing to bring him to a conclusion. This could go on in perptuity.
The concept of bringing the investigation to a conclusion assumes there is a defined scope.
>>Yes, he has a duty to complete this investigation, without straying off into the hinterlands, seeking out process crimes. Time for him to wrap it up.<<
Think about it. He has a blank check on scope, financing and unlimited subpoena powers, including overriding the up until now sacrosanct attorney-client privilege (next up to be ignored: doctor/patient? Marital?).
He has no specific deliverable and timeline and answers to no one.
A better job has never existed in the history of mankind. He is even better off than kings and emperors as he doesn’t even have to answer to subjects.
No way does he end this thing until funding is pulled.
They are purposefully making it as long as ken Starr and benghayinvestigations. Seriously they are.