Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OIG Report - Recommendations
OIG Report ^ | 6/14/18 | oig

Posted on 06/14/2018 11:27:59 AM PDT by DouglasKC

II. Recommendations For these reasons, and as more fully described in previous chapters, we recommend the following:

1. The Department and the FBI consider developing practice guidance that would assist investigators and prosecutors in identifying the general risks with and alternatives to permitting a witness to attend a voluntary interview of another witness, in particular when the witness is serving as counsel for the other witness.

2. The Department consider making explicit that, except in situations where the law requires or permits disclosure, an investigating agency cannot publicly announce its recommended charging decision prior to consulting with the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, or his or her designee, and cannot proceed without the approval of one of these officials.

3. The Department and the FBI consider adopting a policy addressing the appropriateness of Department employees discussing the conduct of uncharged individuals in public statements.

4. The Department consider providing guidance to agents and prosecutors concerning the taking of overt investigative steps, indictments, public announcements, or other actions that could impact an election.

5. The Office of the Deputy Attorney General consider taking steps to improve the retention and monitoring of text messages Departmentwide.

6. The FBI add a warning banner to all of the FBI’s mobile phones and mobile devices in order to further notify users that they have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

7. The FBI consider (a) assessing whether it has provided adequate training to employees about the proper use of text messages and instant messages, including any related discovery obligations, and (b) providing additional guidance about the allowable uses of FBI devices for any non-governmental purpose, including guidance about the use of FBI devices for political conversations

8. The FBI consider whether (a) it is appropriately educating employees about both its media contact policy and the Department’s ethics rules pertaining to the acceptance of gifts, and (b) its disciplinary provisions and penalties are sufficient to deter such improper conduct.

9. Department ethics officials consider implementing a review of campaign donations when Department employees or their spouses run for public office.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 4dchess; dojigrecommendations; dojigreportanalysis; dojigreportreleased; igrecommendations; jamescomey; lisapage; oig; oigrecommendations; peterstrzok; recommendations; robertmueller; trustsessions; whitewash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: DouglasKC

No recommendation about granting immunity to one party while executing midnight raids on the other?


21 posted on 06/14/2018 11:44:31 AM PDT by JoeRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

It is at the point where the inspectors themselves are ignorant of policy and law.


22 posted on 06/14/2018 11:44:34 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Sean Hannity’s show tonight should be ON FIRE!


23 posted on 06/14/2018 11:50:31 AM PDT by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101; Lazamataz; tennmountainman; Extremely Extreme Extremist; bigbob
I wonder where the Q God bless and trust Jeff Sessions Douche Super Tanker Brigade is today ;/
24 posted on 06/14/2018 11:51:30 AM PDT by chris37 ("I am everybody." -Mark Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

This is from the conclusions part of the report. May not be as bad as some might think:
“First, we found that several FBI employees who played critical roles in the investigation sent political messages—some of which related directly to the Midyear investigation—that created the appearance of bias and thereby raised questions about the objectivity and thoroughness of the Midyear investigation. Even more seriously, text messages between Strzok and Page pertaining to the Russia investigation, particularly a text message from Strzok on August 8 stating “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.” in response to a Page text “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!,” are not only indicative of a biased state of mind but imply a willingness to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice. While we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed in Chapter Five, the conduct by these employees cast a cloud over the entire FBI investigation and sowed doubt about the FBI’s work on, and its handling of, the Midyear investigation. It also called into question Strzok’s failure in October 2016 to follow up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop. The damage caused by these employees’ actions extends far beyond the scope of the Midyear investigation and goes to the heart of the FBI’s reputation for neutral factfinding and political independence.”

The OIG report states that FBI sent political messages that create appearances of bias and raises questions about objectivity. So it is about far more people than just Strzok and Page.

The OIG did not find “documentary or testimonial evidence that that improper considerations, including political bias, ...”, this conclusion specifically states that, “ the conduct by these employees cast a cloud over the entire FBI investigation and sowed doubt about the FBI’s work on, and its handling of, the Midyear investigation.” In other words, the FBI and DOJ employees did not give him documents or testimony admitting their bias. Of course they didn’t; those corrupt people were not going to sign their own indictment and admit their crimes.The OIG is not saying there wasn’t bias, because this same paragraph clearly states that he believes their was bias.

If you scroll down to Attachment H, you will see a diagram of a number of high-ranking FBI personnel exchanging phone calls with reporters, including over 20 each between the Director (had to be Comey) and a “special Agent” with a particular reporter.

Hard to see how Comey can avoid prosecution for these crimes. The others have real problems, too.


25 posted on 06/14/2018 11:54:08 AM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37; Extremely Extreme Extremist

Damn, you ain’t jokin’. Wow, that Inspector General sure nailed Hillary and the FBI and Comey and Rosenstein to the wall! JEFF SESSIONS, I LOVE YOU! Never go away!


26 posted on 06/14/2018 11:54:16 AM PDT by Lazamataz (What America needs is more Hogg control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Wuss out


27 posted on 06/14/2018 11:54:27 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

They did on McCabe


28 posted on 06/14/2018 11:55:32 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The OIG did not find evidence that Clinton and Lynch discussed the investigation. He did not say they didn’t.


29 posted on 06/14/2018 11:56:17 AM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

My wife, and I posted nothing as we for some silly reason had hope this IG report would be at least somewhat legitimate as sources we’ve come to rely on for straight information have indicated that Horowitz was an honorable, and good guy.

We knew in our hearts the report forthcoming all this time was going to be nothing but spin, and bullshit.

Unfortunately we have been proven right again.


30 posted on 06/14/2018 11:56:28 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Conservatives seek the truth. Democrats seek the power to dictate what truth is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Ha. They are as AWOL today as Sessions is at DOJ.


31 posted on 06/14/2018 11:58:27 AM PDT by tennmountainman ("Trust Sessions" Yeah Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Term is scrubbed


32 posted on 06/14/2018 12:01:33 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chris37

“Trust Sessions”
.......... Q .........

LOL.


33 posted on 06/14/2018 12:01:37 PM PDT by tennmountainman ("Trust Sessions" Yeah Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
can someone explain why Strock still has a job? His mistress quit a month or so ago; obviously hired by a liberal group with a huge pay increase...
34 posted on 06/14/2018 12:02:00 PM PDT by martinidon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
What shall we call this new unconstitutional branch of government....oh wait.

Unconstitutional.

35 posted on 06/14/2018 12:05:29 PM PDT by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on me..if anyone trusts anyone working for the govt or in congress they are a fool. we lay people can see the injustice but the DOJ can’t. incredible.


36 posted on 06/14/2018 12:05:59 PM PDT by rolling_stone (Hang em high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rickomatic
"Sean Hannity’s show tonight should be ON FIRE!"

Hannity and many others should be embarrassed. This IG was an Obama appointee and is part of the federal government. He draws his paycheck from your paycheck!

For months we've been hearing about how good a job and how honest the IG on this case is. That should have been another clue. We heard the same thing about Comey.

How could any professional in this business think this would be anything but a whitewash. The federal government is never going to indict itself.

This crime was not perpetrated by democrats. Paige, Stroke, Comey, Lynch, Obama were not democrats. They were the Federal Government. It was the Federal Government that secretly decided they themselves should be in charge of this country and not the American People.

Drain the swamp = Alter Or Abolish

37 posted on 06/14/2018 12:06:20 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Encouraging Trump to declassify the original report of course!


38 posted on 06/14/2018 12:07:04 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

Listening to his radio show now.


39 posted on 06/14/2018 12:09:04 PM PDT by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

Not surprised. Knew the whitewash would continue. Now that the federal government and the media know without a doubt that they own the game, you will be the pawn. Your move.


40 posted on 06/14/2018 12:12:33 PM PDT by gathersnomoss (Regressive Swamp Dwellers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson