Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jane Long

As I stated previously I dont think that manafort should have been jailed in the first place.

Secondly, torture has a specific definition. Look it up. Almost all definitions require an agent of the govt to physically harm a person causing pain and suffering.

An isolation cell is obviously unpleasant but it is neither cruel or unusual punishment or it would violate the Constitution. Every jail and prison has isolation cells where prisoners are kept out of the general population. Those cells are not torture, by any definition. I have included the california definition of torture belo as an examle. It is the generally accepted version.

“The definition of the crime of “torture” in California is:

Inflicting great bodily injury on another person,
With the intent to cause cruel or extreme pain and suffering,
For the purpose of revenge, extortion, persuasion or any sadistic purpose.
PC206”

As you can see, being in a cell by yourself does not fit the bill.

Whatever you would like to categorize manaforts situation as being, the law specifically defines certain conditions, and since the law defines torture it is quite obvious that that is not occurring by being placed in an isolation cell.


51 posted on 07/10/2018 8:18:14 PM PDT by Okeydoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Okeydoker

Sure, okiedoker. Whatever you say.


52 posted on 07/10/2018 8:19:31 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Okeydoker

When you resort to extreme quibbles, you confess there’s a pretty good similarity.


55 posted on 07/10/2018 10:32:10 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson