Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rubio: ‘NATO Is Still a Good Idea — It Has to Be Modernized’
brietbart ^ | 06/12/2018 | Pam Key

Posted on 07/12/2018 7:50:50 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

Wednesday on Fox News Channel’s “The Daily Briefing,” Sen Marco Rubio (R-FL) said the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was “still a good idea,” but it has to be “modernized.”

When asked about President Donald Trump’s criticism of the alliance, Rubio said, “First of all, NATO is still a good idea. It has to be modernized, so it has a new purpose and a new meaning in the 21st century. I continue to believe and support NATO.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiquated; modernized; nato; outdated; pastusebydate; rino; rubio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: 2big2fail

[But now I see the bulk of defense spending as the means by which politicians get and stay elected (among many such means).]


Defense spending is a lot like insurance. It will seem like a waste until a time that you need it. Then you won’t have time to ramp up spending quickly enough to meet the threat. We’re fortunate to have oceans on either side. Even so, after decades of spending 1% of GDP on defense per year, we spent 2 years of economic output (200% of GDP) fighting WWII. Because of decades of starvation budgets that short-changed both training and equipment, we also lost 400K men, despite getting into the war only after the Axis powers had already taken significant losses (Japan from fighting China, and Germany from fighting Russia), and fighting a smaller fraction of Axis forces than other Allies that were literally involved in life-and-death struggles.

Note that the defense budget is only 10% of total government spending. And it’s the one item that government has always spent money on, because it’s necessary for the protection of the nation. https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/total https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/defense_spending


41 posted on 07/12/2018 8:29:41 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Journalism is about covering important stories. With a pillow, until they stop moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

[They can increase their spending whether or not NATO exists.]


The lesson of the past few centuries is that no European country can defeat Russia whether in offense or defense, alone or in coalition. And Russia’s default mode is offense. That’s why NATO exists - to hold back the Russian leviathan.

The alliance exists so we have a logistical footprint in Europe, so American troops are familiar with the terrain and can operate well with local troops. It also provides a reason to prevent the Democrats from cutting our defense spending to Canadian levels, and spending it on priority items on the liberal wish list.

If we had Canadian levels of defense spending, our response to 9/11 would have involved a diplomatic protest at the UN. 1% of GDP defense spending in the run-up to WWII turned out to be horrendously expensive, as we spent 200% of GDP and 400K dead fighting WWII.


42 posted on 07/12/2018 8:29:59 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Journalism is about covering important stories. With a pillow, until they stop moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
The main reason Russia has not stepped did not step into western Europe is NATO was two US Corps in Germany.
43 posted on 07/12/2018 8:31:21 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Make American Intelligence Great Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Rubio . . .

8 year olds.

Europe’s okay getting 70% of their power from Russia. NATO was designed to protect Europe from Russia. The US pays for most of it. Other than continuing to subsidize European countries who erect barriers to US products, what purpose does NATO serve?


44 posted on 07/12/2018 8:31:53 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

‘NATO Is Still a Good Idea — It Has to Be Modernized’>>>>>>>>>>

The weapons have to be modernized.

But NATO now has a genuine leader in Donald Trump.His meeting with NATO leaders was historic.
He reminds me in some ways of Chesty Puller. Thank God we have him.

” We are surrounded by the enemy. We have them right where we want them!”


45 posted on 07/12/2018 8:32:00 AM PDT by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

“Rubio is a RINO of he first degree with grande illusions of grandeur. I regret immensely my vote for him as the lesser of two evils. Hopefully a true patriot will stand against him next time around. He hates Trump and shows it at every opportunity.”


Rubio trying to be relevant and insert himself in NATO news totally covered because Trump is there. Agree, RINO of first degree.


46 posted on 07/12/2018 8:32:42 AM PDT by upbeat5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
We need NATO to make sure the member nations have a stake in their own and each others defense and not become complacent in their dependence on USA.
If they don't have to bear the cost of future conflicts, they will cause them.

47 posted on 07/12/2018 8:41:24 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

[Europe’s okay getting 70% of their power from Russia. NATO was designed to protect Europe from Russia. The US pays for most of it. Other than continuing to subsidize European countries who erect barriers to US products, what purpose does NATO serve?]


To protect Europe from Russia. But that doesn’t mean Europe won’t screw us over, the way the Japanese and the Koreans have done pretty much since the end of WWII. And we let them do so in order to help their war-devastated economies recover. Those economies are now recovered. So we need to renegotiate the terms of the alliance. We still need the alliance, because we don’t want a Russian empire that extends all the way to the Mediterranean. But it would be nice if the Europeans carried their weight on trade and defense.

A lot of Republicans and Democrats think we should always carry all of the weight, that we should play Santa Claus. Trump’s take is that we not only shouldn’t - we can’t afford to play Santa Claus. If our allies aren’t prepared to fight, we shouldn’t be part of that alliance.


48 posted on 07/12/2018 8:43:00 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Journalism is about covering important stories. With a pillow, until they stop moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

“Rubio” the enabler of the opiod mass selling agenda of the pill mills of Florida, and from Florida to the nation.


49 posted on 07/12/2018 8:46:44 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
We are there in least in part to prevent Germany from getting access to another world class military.

I don’t want an idiot like Merkel, or the E. U. to have a military to complicate global dynamics.

Then why is Trump after them to increase their defense spending?

50 posted on 07/12/2018 8:47:19 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

You can’t get people off the dole without just ending it. It’s the only way that works.

It’s human nature, and yes, both the Japanese (although lately that has changed dramatically, and in Korea too) and the Europeans are hooked on junk.


51 posted on 07/12/2018 8:55:05 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

What is the goal and objective of Nato. I see no real purpose. It certainly is not Russia. Germany is so comfortable with Russia that they buy all their natural gas from Russia in a pipeline they are totally dependent upon. So other that Russia— what is it?


52 posted on 07/12/2018 9:00:12 AM PDT by raiderboy (Trump has assured us that he will shut down the government to get the WALL in Sept.ith the solar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

He’s got to keep himself visible for his 2020 Trump challenge.


53 posted on 07/12/2018 9:09:00 AM PDT by JustSurrounded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

I think he has pegged his request at 2% of their individual GDP. We pay 4% of ours.

Germany is paying a little over 1% of their GDP, others are slackers too.

He’s just tired of us having to pick up the full tab.

They can help out more than they are, and they know it.

This 2% figure would not be big enough to cause trouble. Hey, they don’t want to spend anything.


54 posted on 07/12/2018 9:14:00 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Take a look out there folks. Can you see evidence of a Left Wing Hate Group, perhaps fascist too?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Is there any huge antiquated bureaucracy that doesn’t get his man/boy love?


55 posted on 07/12/2018 9:23:46 AM PDT by cgbg (Hidden behind the social justice warrior mask is corruption and sexual deviance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Tomorrow’s headlines today:

Maxine Waters Calls on NATO to Impeach Trump

Kamala Harris Demands ICE Budget Be Sent to Germany to Defend Russian Pipeline Against Russian Aggression


56 posted on 07/12/2018 9:38:43 AM PDT by FirstFlaBn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Do in other words Marco, you want to continue to subsidize the Yurps in perpetuity with no recognizable benefit to the US. That doesn’t work for us. We’ve done that for 73 years. Enough.


57 posted on 07/12/2018 9:41:27 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

POTUS is right about the double standards of countries that hide behind NATO, still deal with Russia while America pays most of the NATO tab. NATO seems to think it is too big to fail and is essential like the worthless UN. It is essential that America trains with other military forces and has alliances but the NATO charter is obsolete.


58 posted on 07/12/2018 10:19:38 AM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
It's a good idea IF they're not a bunch of ingrates ripping off the American people.
59 posted on 07/12/2018 10:29:37 AM PDT by GOPJ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-s1_nfs7f4 STOP https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-IsingvI_I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2big2fail

NATO has been wondering aimlessly since 1991. It either has to evolve or end. Western Europe as shown by Germany has shown they are at ease with the Russian bear. I would suggest the US start a repositioning of forces to Asia from Europe. The krauts will wail like stuck pigs when we start closing those big US bases which they claim to hate but eagerly want the $$$ from those bases.

I would not however leave Poland and eastern Europe to the good graces of the Russian bear. I would think a couple of US bases and mutual defense pacts with Poland and Hungary possibly would be a good deterrent. As for the western Eurotrash, the free ride should be over asap.


60 posted on 07/12/2018 10:31:36 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson