Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EagleUSA

I believe there are a few reasons. First, I suspect that with four engines the 747 has more power-generation capability, and probably has better flight characteristics and range after the loss of one engine than would be the case with the 777.

Also, by sticking with the same airframe they’re not having to “reinvent the wheel” to accommodate the technology already incorporated into the current 747 frame.

Fuel efficiency is probably not the biggest consideration because of the air-refueling capability of the aircraft.

Just my opinion...


4 posted on 07/18/2018 9:04:39 AM PDT by RavenATB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: RavenATB
Fuel efficiency is probably not the biggest consideration because of the air-refueling capability of the aircraft.

Air refueling has been deleted from the replacement because it was never needed with the current 747s.

17 posted on 07/18/2018 9:56:11 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson