I notice that the poll title is very ambiguously worded, perhaps to trick responders into voting the opposite of how they intended to. This something we were taught NOT to do back when I studied persuasive communications back in graduate school. It can completely invalidate the results of an experiment. Or, in this case, throw the results of the poll into complete confusion.
No kidding. Intentionally cryptic?
I agree, I had to stretch my brain for a few minutes, but the poll is asking if you agree or disagree with the article, which is considered “opposing view”.