How Many Subjects?: Statistical Power Analysis in Research (2015) by Christine Blasey

Google Books ^ | 2015 | By Helena Chmura Kraemer, Christine Blasey

[11th_VA]

I thought she lived quite a distance from the Country Club?

I grew up in the area. You couldn't walk it. It's probably a 15-20 minute DRIVE. She was coached to conveniently forget everything before or after the incident.

[bgill]

Thanks, BD.

So, granny was Margaret Lucille Reamy, born on April 12, 1918 in Marion, Ohio and passed away on July 30, 2018 in Lanham, Maryland. The funeral was on Monday, Aug. 6. Ford spent that night at the hotel near the airport. Tuesday morning, Aug. 7, was the polygraph.

Odd that it's a mostly black cemetery and grandparents on both sides buried there. Noticing most of the snapshots at the top of the cemetery site are of minorities. Wondering why we can't see the memories people have shared. Still not seeing how the CIA fits in.

[bgill]

I read it as “Christy” but either way, she doesn’t go by that name. She went by Chrissy in her year book or Christine as an adult. No Christy.

The last name is missing the “e”. All the other letters are legible and the spacing is accurate for there not being the “e”. There is not so much as a squiggle or long line where the “e” should be as is many times when someone quickly signs their name.

Just as with the “4 boys” story suddenly turning into 3 boys and a girl with a boy’s name, it smells suspiciously of someone who isn’t familiar with the details writing this polygraph statement and the Finestein letter.

A college prof who’s grammar and penmanship is this demented with the chicken scratching and scribble outs shows a mental problem. No one this educated would have this many scribble outs. The retired FBI polygrapher knows better than to allow so many scribble outs on a document that may come under legal scrutiny.

No polygraph consists of two questions. Not even base line questions. And the guy said this is normal. It’s no wonder the FBI has such a bad reputation. Someone needs to find out if he’s for real.

“George, did you murder your wife?” “No.” “You didn’t stab her?” “No.” “Congratulations, you passed!” That would be laughed out of court so fast.

[Vermont Lt]

She is not that kind of psychologist. Her specialty is statistical analysis in social psychological populations. In short she consults with pharmaceutical companies to establish the validity of drug tests and the like.

She is not your cornerstone head shrinker.

I don’t believe her story. But we should be accurate in our descriptions—that way we can focus the conspiracy theories where they are “true.”

[Baldwin77]

This is not Ford in the picture. Too heavy, too blonde, not tan, hair too short.

[Baldwin77]

I wondered about that.

[bgill]

I’ve thought the same. The Kenyan and the BC all over again.

[bgill]

Some answers up thread.

[Fred Nerks]

This is not Ford in the picture. Too heavy, too blonde, not tan, hair too short.

Christine Blasey Ford's attorneys release polygraph results on Kavanaugh allegations

Results of a polygraph test taken by Judge Brett Kavanaugh accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, indicate her responses to the two questions asked of her about her sexual assault allegations against him to be "not indicative of deception," according to the report on the polygraph.

The polygraph test was administered on August 7, one week after she wrote a letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein detailing her story of the assault. For the test, Ford gave her account, in which she alleges that when they were both in high school, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed during a party and groped her, trying to remove her clothing. When she tried to scream, Ford said Kavanaugh held his hand over her mouth.

Following Ford's interview she was given a polygraph examination with the following two questions:

1.Is any part of your statement false?

2.Did you make up any part of your statement?

Ford answered "no" to both questions. "Blasey's responses to the above relevant questions are not indicative of deception," the report read. Two more analyses of Ford's responses also suggested she had been truthful.

Christine Blasey Ford sits for her polygraph test. / Courtesy of Ford's legal team

SOURCE CBS NEWS

[Kickaha]

I was thinking the same thing. From another thread I wrote

“I wondered if any voice recording of her have survived the Memory-Hole. I’m interested in lectures, local TV interviews, her screaming bloody murder at an abortion or anti-Trump rally. Anything that would contrast with the seven year old girl we heard yesterday.”

[MHGinTN]

Likely was up on social media and ONE of the reasons her entire Internet footprint has been scrubbed. As an over the hill surfer ‘queen’, she probably had many photos, etc. on the Net which would contradict the fake fifteen year old persona she foisted on the world and JEFF FLAKE. (What the heck is wrong with Arizonans that they would send such an immature, low IQ dweeb to Washington?)

[Hot Tabasco]

No glasses in that photo......I suspected the ones she wore at the hearing were just cosmetic and not functional.......

[Brown Deer]

Still not seeing how the CIA fits in.

Supposedly, her father Ralph is the one...

CIA Honeytrap set - Kavanaugh accuser CIA ties

Of course, this theory is perfectly, logically, and legally impossible to prove, as the CIA operates under the explicit cover of national security, which is the end all and be all of the Shadow Government.

[Brown Deer]

Those glasses she was wearing, had very thick lenses.

[Fred Nerks]

from your link, fascinating...

An intriguing in-depth new Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that a Stanford University Psychiatry Professor named Dr. Christine Blasey has become the latest centerpiece of a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) plot to harm President Trump with her last-minute allegation, just days prior to US Senate confirmation, that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh had attempted to sexually assault her over 30 years ago when they were teenage school children—while being kept from the American people about Dr. Blasey is that she currently oversees the CIA Undergraduate Internship Program Stanford University developed by the notorious CIA-connected Stanford University Psychiatric Professor Dr. Frederick T. Melges—who himself, in 1985, took into his care the homeless woman Lois Lang who assassinated CIA paymaster Nick Deak—and that afterwards saw the CIA’sblack operations monies being controlled by Ralph G. Blasey Jr.—who, not so mysteriously, just happens to be the father of Dr. Christine Blasey.

[Fred Nerks]

Her glasses...look like she borrowed them, the frames have seen better days.

[Hot Tabasco]

The frames are just light reflections. I wore glasses almost all my life and her lenses do not indicate any thickness whatsoever...........They’re new and for cosmetic purposes only........Kinda like Marie Harf’s........

[scrabblehack]

It looks like basic statistics actually.

[Fred Nerks]

I agree, they look like thin glass, no magnification. Probably a studio prop belonging to whoever did her hair coloring, hair extensions and contour makeup.

[Fred Nerks]

Records Show Dr. Ford Is Not A Licensed Psychologist, May Have Committed Perjury

Testifying under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Christine Blasey Ford identified herself as a ‘psychologist,’ but records indict this is a false statement under California law. Someone at Stanford University also appears to have caught the blunder and edited Ford’s faculty page.

https://www.dangerous.com/49836/records-show-dr-ford-is-not-a-licensed-psychologist-may-have-committed-perjury/