Posted on 10/17/2018 5:48:42 PM PDT by dontreadthis
use the link to read the thread
Yeah, all the random thoughts interspersed is what really made his thread hard to comprehend. More importantly, it was annoying because I wanted to get to the meat of what he was saying.
I don’t know that he is wrong. Neither do you.
Larry Schweikart, Author, Pollster and was on the Trump Boeing during the 2016 campaign.
Just google "Larry Schweikart books" for a list of his best sellers.
The Trump team in 2016 were smart enough to solve this issue
They simply asked:
"and who do you think your neighbor would vote for?"
So even after all we now know about Sessions, you STILL think Sessions is working for President Trump in a good way? Like I said, to think otherwise is to buy the Q type BS that Sessions is covertly pretending to be Deep State in order for him to work behind the scenes. That is NOT the case.
People only said there would be a blue rebound because historically there has frequently been one, but only when the new President has screwed up or gone back on his promises. The Congress gets punished by giving power to the other side. But when the president has NOT screwed up and has NOT gone back on his promises, the record shows something different.
That’s double 2014, and probably, as Larry says, even beating 2016.
At least, goodman Weston, we have a government interested in TRYING to do something about it. I’m hoping for a ghost in the machine, i.e., a crackdown on cheating, and a BIG surprise for the leftists.
Then the cry will be that the Russians must have hacked the elections because the country would never (essentially) vote the death sentence for the demoKKKrats.
Yes, and amen to your hope. If we eek this one out, All Glory to God.
Thank you Mr. S!
We are so fortunate to have you on this forum!!!
Bless you for this summary!!!
Seriously?
How about looking at his data. It’s compelling. I’m a Q fan too.
You’re most welcome.
“Thread reader version of LS twitter thread:”
—
I posted the Threadreader contents in regular format here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3697575/replies?c=49
bookmark
Yeah, ok.
LS is compelling (if that’s what you meant). And I follow Q. I don’t think Sessions is useless as the poster I replied to does.
;)
You’re kind of smug with your two word answer. How about a reasoned response that actually answers or refutes my statement instead of a regurgitated “yeah, ok” lame response.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.