They get more money for the larger, more-developed organs.
the peons and peasants interfere with the due glory of the state
The governor who endorsed murder should have the opportunity to experience governor-cide fist hand. That is what he has legitimized.
C’mon folks this only proves what our side has always known, and that the Democrats have always admired Russia, from Soviet Union days to the present. There’s your damned collusion MSM!
For the Soviet Union, it was also the solution to “reducing birth rates” when they lacked the regular supply lines to deliver contraception.
We can’t guarantee a steady supply of birth control, so you can have an abortion any time you want it.
I can’t remember where I read it, but they also shortchanged women during delivery. That you had better pain relief and support during an abortion than you did during delivery of a baby.
The evil demoncrats demand human sacrifice to satisfy their blood lust.
This should be not surprise to anyone knowledgeable of history.
And these people call Trump Hitler.
One seldom recognizes the devil when he rests his hand upon your shoulder.
Democrats are showing that they are opposed to LIFE, LIBERTY, and THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS!!
Democrats’ Latest Abortion Plan to Kill Baby During Birth Comes Straight from SATAN!!!
On the underlying question moral question discussed here, nothing addresses it better than the simple logic of this quotation from Mother Teresa, who, at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, DC on February 3, 1994, as cited above, stated: "And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another?"
Mother Teresa's declaration may be the most powerful statement in 2016 from which to begin discussions of where a candidate stands on all the questions of life and liberty.
The sole reason these rights were deemed unalienable is that both are derived from the Creator--not from the mother or father, and not from government or judicial decision. What is "granted" by human decision also can, by implication, be withheld.
"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them (life and liberty)," said Thomas Jefferson.
"The world is different now. . . and yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forefathers fought are still at issue around the globe--the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God." - John F. Kennedy, Inaugural Address
That understanding underlies every other consideration embodied in our Declaration of Independence and every protection of our Constitution. It is the very basis of our rights to life and liberty, of laws to protect them, and it distinguishes ours from other forms of government.
When we fail to acknowledge that foundation of our liberty, then we risk liberty itself for future generations, for where does the right to choose who lives and who does not really end?
That is why the question is of vital importance in each election. Already, we have deprived millions of their Creator-endowed rights to life and liberty, and our nation must be weaker for their loss. We need leaders who understand the implications and potential consequences of departing from our founding principles.
In recent decades, technological advances have enabled us to observe the characteristics and actions of God's tiniest creations in the womb. Unlike previous generations who could not see, we have no excuse for imagining that these are mere blobs of tissue labeled "fetuses." In their early weeks, we now can see that they are living babies who will continue on to possess life and liberty if we do not "destroy" both. Indeed, they are simply smaller versions of ourselves.
Questions on the economy, taxes, threats from terrorists, health care--all are considerations at this election time. One, however, may be basic to all others. Who will best protect the underlying premise of our Constitution--and the lives and liberties of millions yet unborn?
Promises are illusive and cheap. One fact is indisputable, however: Democrats are committed to the Far Left's agenda on this matter, and that agenda is not compatible with our Constitution's premise.
Mao had the same policy. His one child program killed millions of infants. Stalin and Mao had one goal - break up the family.
P4L
Hippocratic Oath: First do no harm.
Hippocritic Oath: First do all harm.